Cited by 18Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationPsychology of Social Influence

When people low in social class become a persuasive source of communication: Social class of other donors and charitable donations

Cha, Moon-Kyung, Yi, Youjae, Lee, Jaehoon·2020·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.039

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 105 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cha, M.-K., Yi, Y., & Lee, J.
Affiliations
  • Myongji University (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Florida International University (US)
Corresponding author
Yi, Youjae
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
112
Pages
45-55
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012069306
Cited by
18
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
social class, charitable giving, self-reflection, economic inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review