Cited by 933Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentMental Health Research Topics

Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample.

DeYoung, Colin G.·2006·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

In a large community sample (N=490), the Big Five were not orthogonal when modeled as latent variables representing the shared variance of reports from 4 different informants. Additionally, the standard higher-order factor structure was present in latent space: Neuroticism (reversed), Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness formed one factor, labeled Stability, and Extraversion and Openness/Intellect formed a second factor, labeled Plasticity. Comparison of two instruments, the Big Five Inventory and the Mini-Markers, supported the hypotheses that single-adjective rating instruments are likely to yield lower interrater agreement than phrase rating instruments and that lower interrater agreement is associated with weaker correlations among the Big Five and a less coherent higher-order factor structure. In conclusion, an interpretation of the higher-order factors is discussed, including possible neurobiological substrates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeYoung, C. G.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
DeYoung, Colin G.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2006
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
1138-1151
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2075134121
Cited by
933
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 55
FWCI
19.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Ontario Graduate Scholarship
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, higher-order factor structure, interobserver agreement, Big Five Inventory, neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, openness to experience, latent variable models
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Character, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review