CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,068Primate Behavior and EcologyLanguage and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Social Brain: Mind, Language, and Society in Evolutionary Perspective

Dunbar, R.I.M.·2003·Annual Review of Anthropology
DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

▪ Abstract The social brain (or Machiavellian Intelligence) hypothesis was proposed to explain primates' unusually large brains: It argues that the cognitive demands of living in complexly bonded social groups selected for increases in executive brain (principally neocortex). The evidence for this and alternative hypotheses is reviewed. Although there remain difficulties of interpretation, the bulk of the evidence comes down in favor of the social brain hypothesis. The extent to which the cognitive demands of bonding large intensely social groups involve aspects of social cognition, such as theory of mind, is explored. These findings are then related to the evolution of social group size, language, and culture within the hominid lineage.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Byrne RW. 1996. Relating brain size to intelligence in primates. In Modelling the Early Hominid Mind , ed. P Mellars, K Gibson, pp. 1–8. Cambridge, UK: Macdonald Inst. Archaeol. Res.
  2. Dunbar RIM. 1989. Reproductive strategies of female gelada baboons. In Sociobiology of Sexual and Reproductive Strategies , ed. A Rasa, C Vogel, E Voland, pp. 74–92. London: Chapman & Hall
  3. Dunbar RIM. 1998b. Theory of mind and the evolution of language. In Approaches to the Evolution of Language , ed. J Hurford, M Studdart-Kennedy, C Knight, pp. 92–110. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  4. Dunbar RIM. 2003. Why are apes so smart? In Primate Life Histories , ed. P Kappeler, M Peirera. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. In press
  5. 10.1037//0033-295X.94.1.84 · DOI
  6. Silk JB, 2003, Anim. Behav.
  7. Tomasello M, 1998, Primate Cognition.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,068

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dunbar, R. I. M.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Dunbar, R.I.M.
ORCID
Dunbar, R.I.M.
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2003-10
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
163-181
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
DOI
10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158
OpenAlex
W2130307024
Cited by
1,068
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 58
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
social brain hypothesis, Machiavellian intelligence, primate brain evolution, neocortex, social cognition, theory of mind, social group size, language evolution, cultural evolution, hominid evolution, social bonding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review