Cited by 739Stress Responses and CortisolEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Status and Health in Humans and Other Animals

Sapolsky, Robert M.·2004·Annual Review of Anthropology

Abstract

▪ Abstract Dominance hierarchies exist in numerous social species, and rank in such hierarchies can dramatically influence the quality of an individual's life. Rank can dramatically influence also the health of an individual, particularly with respect to stress-related disease. This chapter reviews first the nature of stress, the stress-response and stress-related disease, as well as the varieties of hierarchical systems in animals. I then review the literature derived from nonhuman species concerning the connections between rank and functioning of the adrenocortical, cardiovascular, reproductive, and immune systems. As shown here, the relationship is anything but monolithic. Finally, I consider whether rank is a relevant concept in humans and argue that socioeconomic status (SES) is the nearest human approximation to social rank and that SES dramatically influences health.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144000

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barnett S, 1955, Nature, 75, l26
  3. Eberhart J, 1979, J. Endocrinol., 83, 42
  4. Herd J, 1987, Circulation, 76, 189
  5. Lynch J, 2004, Milbank Q.
  6. Marmot M, 2000, Encyclopedia of Stress, 2, 313
  7. McEwen B, 2002, The End of Stress
  8. Pincus T, 1995, Advances, 11, 4
  9. Sapolsky R, 1989, Am. J. Primatol., 8, l
  10. Sapolsky R, 2004, Publ. Lib. Sci., 2, E106
  11. Scanlon J, 1985, Am. J. Primatol., 8, 363
  12. Suomi S, 1987, Perinatal Development: A Psychobiological Perspective, 397

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 739

Metadata

Authors
Sapolsky, R. M.
Affiliations
Institute of Primate Research (KE)
Corresponding author
Sapolsky, Robert M.
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2004-10-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
393-418
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
OpenAlex
W2116982066
Cited by
739
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 34
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social rank, dominance hierarchy, socioeconomic status, stress, stress response, stress-related disorders, adrenocortical system, cardiovascular system, reproductive system, immune system, human health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review