The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation?
Open accessAbstract
There is a growing appreciation that chromosome inversions affect rates of adaptation, speciation, and the evolution of sex chromosomes. Comparative genomic studies have identified many new paracentric inversion polymorphisms. Population models suggest that inversions can spread by reducing recombination between alleles that independently increase fitness, without epistasis or coadaptation. Areas of linkage disequilibrium extend across large inversions but may be interspersed by areas with little disequilibrium. Genes located within inversions are associated with a variety of traits including those involved in climatic adaptation. Inversion polymorphisms may contribute to speciation by generating underdominance owing to inviable gametes, but an alternative view gaining support is that inversions facilitate speciation by reducing recombination, protecting genomic regions from introgression. Likewise, inversions may facilitate the evolution of sex chromosomes by reducing recombination between sex determining alleles and alleles with sex-specific effects. However, few genes within inversions responsible for fitness effects or speciation have been identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome
The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04072 · Cited by 2,459
Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny
Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06341 · Cited by 2,010
Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citationChromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation
Kirkpatrick, M., & Barton, N. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.047985 · Cited by 1,178
A Polytene Chromosome Analysis of the Anopheles gambiae Species Complex
Coluzzi, M., Sabatini, A., della Torre, A., Di Deco, M. A., & Petrarca, V. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077769 · Cited by 447 · cited 1×
“As predicted by the model, fixed inversions occur between sympatric, but not allopatric, species in the group (Coluzzi et al. 2002).”
BackgroundRecombination suppressors and the evolution of new species
Trickett, A. J., & Butlin, R. K. (1994) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1994.180 · Cited by 138
Highly variable rates of genome rearrangements between hemiascomycetous yeast lineages
Fischer, G., Rocha, E. P. C., Brunet, F., Vergassola, M., & Dujon, B. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020032 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions
Hoban, S., Kelley, J. L., Lotterhos, K. E., Antolin, M. F., Bradburd, G., Lowry, D. B., Poss, M. L., Reed, L. K., Storfer, A., & Whitlock, M. C. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/688018 · Cited by 876
“As a result of background selection, loci in polymorphic inversions may show higher F ST than loci without structural rearrangements because inversions suppress meiotic recombination (Hoffmann and Rieseberg 2008).”
Lowry, D. B., & Willis, J. H. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000500 · Cited by 679
Huang, W., Massouras, A., Inoue, Y., Peiffer, J., Ràmia, M., Tarone, A. M., Turlapati, L., Zichner, T., Zhu, D., Lyman, R. F., et al. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.171546.113 · Cited by 661
Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry
Joron, M., Frezal, L., Jones, R. T., Chamberlain, N. L., Lee, S. F., Haag, C. R., Whibley, A., Becuwe, M., Baxter, S. W., Ferguson, L., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10341 · Cited by 574
Natural selection interacts with recombination to shape the evolution of hybrid genomes
Schumer, M., Xu, C., Powell, D. L., Durvasula, A., Skov, L., Holland, C., Blazier, J. C., Sankararaman, S., Andolfatto, P., Rosenthal, G. G., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3684 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffmann, A. A., & Rieseberg, L. H.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2008-12-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-42
- ISSN
- 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2069
- OpenAlex
- W2118067630
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173532
- The paper
- Hoffmann, A. A., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2008). Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
