Cited by 697Face Recognition and PerceptionEmotions and Moral BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Facial Efference And The Experience Of Emotion

Adelmann, P K, Zajonc, R B·1989·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

A revolution in the science of emotion has emerged in recent decades, with the potential to create a paradigm shift in decision theories. The research reveals that emotions constitute potent, pervasive, predictable, sometimes harmful and sometimes ...Read More

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.001341

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adelmann, P. K., & Zajonc, R. B.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
1989-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
249-280
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2138096165
Cited by
697
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 28
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotional experience, facial feedback, emotion regulation, decision-making, emotion theory
MeSH terms
Attitude, Emotions, Biological Evolution, Facial Expression, Feedback, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review