The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adrenocortical Carcinomas and Adrenal Pheochromocytomas: Mass and Enhancement Loss Evaluation at Delayed Contrast-enhanced CT
Abstract
PURPOSE: To retrospectively measure the adrenal gland attenuation and the percentage loss of adrenal gland enhancement at delayed contrast medium-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in patients with adrenocortical carcinomas and pheochromocytomas and to compare these data with those in patients with adenomas and metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee, which waived informed consent. Eleven patients with proved adrenocortical carcinoma, 17 with proved pheochromocytoma, 23 with adrenal adenoma, and 16 with metastasis to the adrenal gland underwent helical CT. Nonenhanced CT was followed by contrast-enhanced CT 1 minute and 10 minutes later. Attenuation and enhancement loss values were calculated. RESULTS: The mean attenuation of adenomas (8 HU +/- 18 [standard deviation]) was significantly lower than those of adrenocortical carcinomas (39 HU +/- 14), pheochromocytomas (44 HU +/- 11), and metastases (34 HU +/- 11) on nonenhanced CT scans (P < .001). Although the mean attenuation values for nonadenomas (ie, adrenocortical carcinomas, pheochromocytomas, and metastases) were significantly higher than the value for adenomas on the 1-minute contrast-enhanced CT scans (P < .001), there was more overlap in attenuation between adenomas and nonadenomas on contrast-enhanced scans than on nonenhanced scans. On the 10-minute delayed contrast-enhanced scans, the mean attenuation of adenomas (32 HU +/- 17) was significantly lower than the mean attenuations of carcinomas (72 HU +/- 15), pheochromocytomas (83 HU +/- 14), and metastases (66 HU +/- 13) (P < .001). At optimal threshold values of 50% for absolute percentage of enhancement loss and 40% for relative percentage of enhancement loss at 10 minutes, both the sensitivity and the specificity for the diagnosis of adenoma were 100% when adenomas were compared with carcinomas, pheochromocytomas, and metastases. CONCLUSION: The enhancement loss in adrenocortical carcinomas and pheochromocytomas is similar to that in adrenal metastases but significantly less than that in adrenal adenomas. The percentage change in contrast material washout is a useful adjunct to absolute CT attenuation values in differentiating adrenal adenomas from adrenocortical carcinomas and pheochromocytomas.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Approximately 30% of benign adrenal adenomas do not contain large amounts of fat and have an attenuation value of >10 HU (ie, lipid-poor adenomas), these lesions cannot be reliably characterized on unenhanced CT due to an overlapping density with malignant lesions and pheochromocytomas (295,296).”
From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [296]
In the citing paper
“Values of > 40% suggest a benign adenoma (296,299,300) (Fig. 6).”
From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [296]
Citations
Cites
Adrenal Masses: Characterization with Combined Unenhanced and Delayed Enhanced CT
Caoili, E. M., KOROBKIN, M. T., Francis, I. R., Cohan, R. H., Platt, J. F., Dunnick, N. R., & Raghupathi, K. I. (2002) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2223010766 · Cited by 684
Self-citationPeña, C. S., Boland, G. W. L., Hahn, P. F., Lee, M. J., & Mueller, P. R. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc29798 · Cited by 399
Lee, M. J., Hahn, P. F., Papanicolaou, N., Egglin, T. K., Saini, S., Müeller, P. R., & Simeone, J. F. (1991) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.179.2.2014283 · Cited by 390
CT time-attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas
Korobkin, M., Brodeur, F. J., Francis, I. R., Quint, L. E., Dunnick, N. R., & Londy, F. (1998) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.170.3.9490968 · Cited by 386
Self-citationDifferentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using CT attenuation values.
KOROBKIN, M. T., Brodeur, F. J., Yutzy, G. G., Francis, I. R., Quint, L. E., Dunnick, N. R., & Kazerooni, E. A. (1996) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.166.3.8623622 · Cited by 364
Self-citationState-of-the-Art Adrenal Imaging
Mayo-Smith, W. W., Boland, G. W., Noto, R. B., & Lee, M. J. (2001) · Radiographics · doi:10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl21995 · Cited by 364
Nonfunctioning adrenal masses: incidental discovery on computed tomography
Glazer, H., Weyman, P., Sagel, S., Levitt, R., & McClennan, B. (1982) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.139.1.81 · Cited by 347
Benign adrenocortical masses: diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging.
Mitchell, D. G., Crovello, M., Matteucci, T., Petersen, R. O., & Miettinen, M. (1992) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.185.2.1410337 · Cited by 333
Delayed enhanced CT of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas
Caoili, E. M., Korobkin, M., Francis, I. R., Cohan, R. H., & Dunnick, N. R. (2000) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.175.5.1751411 · Cited by 305
Adrenal adenomas: relationship between histologic lipid and CT and MR findings.
KOROBKIN, M. T., Giordano, T. J., Brodeur, F. J., Francis, I. R., Siegelman, E. S., Quint, L. E., Dunnick, N. R., Heiken, J. P., & Wang, H. H. (1996) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.200.3.8756925 · Cited by 304
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Incidentally Discovered Adrenal Mass
Young, W. F. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp065470 · Cited by 1,090
Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Clinical Update
Allolio, B., & Fassnacht, M. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2005-2639 · Cited by 775
Update in Adrenocortical Carcinoma
Faßnacht, M., Kroiß, M., & Allolio, B. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2013-3020 · Cited by 414
Adrenocortical carcinoma: a clinician’s update
Fassnacht, M., Libé, R., Kroiss, M., & Allolio, B. (2011) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2010.235 · Cited by 396
Incidental Adrenal Lesions: Principles, Techniques, and Algorithms for Imaging Characterization
Boland, G. W., Blake, M. A., Hahn, P. F., & Mayo-Smith, W. W. (2008) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2493070976 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Szolar, D. H., Korobkin, M., Reittner, P., Berghold, A., Bauernhofer, T., Trummer, H., Schoellnast, H., Preidler, K. W., & Samonigg, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Graz (AT)
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 234
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 479-485
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2137978892
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- adrenocortical carcinoma, adrenal pheochromocytoma, adrenal adenoma, adrenal metastasis, differential diagnosis, adrenal imaging, sensitivity and specificity, adrenal mass characterization
- MeSH terms
- Adenoma, Adolescent, Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pheochromocytoma, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Adrenocortical Carcinoma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review