CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Energy expenditure and subsequent nutrient intakes in overfed young men

Roberts, S. B., Young, V. R., Fuss, P., Fiatarone, M. A., Richard, B., Rasmussen, H., Wagner, D., Joseph, L., Holehouse, E., Evans, W. J.·1990·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
DOI 10.1152/ajpregu.1990.259.3.r461
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We investigated the mechanisms of body weight regulation in young men of normal body weight leading unrestricted lives. Changes in total and resting energy expenditure, body composition, and subsequent voluntary nutrient intakes in response to overeating by 4,230 +/- 115 (SE) kJ/day (1,011 +/- 27 kcal/day) for 21 days were measured in seven subjects consuming a typical diet. On average, 85-90% of the excess energy intake was deposited (with 87% of this amount in fat and 13% in protein on average). There was no detectable difference between individuals in susceptibility to energy deposition. The resting metabolic rate, averaged for fasting and fed states, increased during overfeeding (mean +/- SE, 628 +/- 197 kJ/day, P less than 0.01), but at least some of this amount was obligatory expenditure associated with nutrient assimilation. No significant increase in energy expenditure for physical activity or thermoregulation resulted from overfeeding. Thus energy expenditure did not substantially adapt to increased energy intake. However, significant decreases in voluntary energy intake (1,991 +/- 824 kJ/day, P less than 0.05) and fat intake (48 +/- 11 g/day, P less than 0.01) followed overeating, indicating that adaptive changes in nutrient intakes can contribute significantly to body weight regulation after overeating.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.1990.259.3.r461

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Roberts, S. B., Young, V. R., Fuss, P., Fiatarone, M. A., Richard, B., Rasmussen, H., Wagner, D., Joseph, L., Holehouse, E., & Evans, W. J.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Human Physiology, United States Department ofAgriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University,Boston 02111.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Published
1990-09-01
Volume
259
Issue
3
Pages
R461-R469
ISSN
  • 0363-6119
  • 1522-1490
DOI
10.1152/ajpregu.1990.259.3.r461
Cited by
13
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review