CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 299Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strength training increases resting metabolic rate and norepinephrine levels in healthy 50- to 65-yr-old men

Pratley, R., Nicklas, B., Rubin, M., Miller, J., Smith, A., Smith, M., Hurley, B., Goldberg, A.·1994·Journal of Applied Physiology
DOI 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.1.133
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Resting metabolic rate (RMR) decreases with age, largely because of an age-related decline in fat-free mass (FFM). We hypothesized that a strength-training program capable of eliciting increases in FFM would also increase RMR in older individuals. To test this hypothesis, RMR, body composition, and plasma concentrations of certain hormones known to affect RMR were measured before and after a 16-wk heavy-resistance strength-training program in 13 healthy men 50–65 yr of age. Average strength levels, assessed by the three-repetition maximum test, increased 40% with training (P < 0.001). Body weight did not change, but body fat decreased (25.6 +/- 1.5 vs. 23.7 +/- 1.7%; P < 0.001) and FFM increased (60.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 62.2 +/- 2.1 kg; P < 0.01). RMR, measured by indirect calorimetry, increased 7.7% with strength training (6,449 +/- 217 vs. 6,998 +/- 226 kJ/24 h; P < 0.01). This increase remained significant even when RMR was expressed per kilogram of FFM. Strength training increased arterialized plasma norepinephrine levels 36% (1.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.1 nmol/l; P < 0.01) but did not change fasting glucose, insulin, or thyroid hormone levels. These results indicate that a heavy-resistance strength-training program increases RMR in healthy older men, perhaps by increasing FFM and sympathetic nervous system activity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.1.133

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pratley, R., Nicklas, B., Rubin, M., Miller, J., Smith, A., Smith, M., Hurley, B., & Goldberg, A.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Published
1994-01-01
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
133-137
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
DOI
10.1152/jappl.1994.76.1.133
OpenAlex
W2120739693
Cited by
299
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k08ag000494-03, 5r01ag007660-06, 5p01ag004402-10)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01-AG-04402, KO8-AG-00494, R01-AG-07660)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
resistance training, resting metabolic rate, norepinephrine, fat-free mass, aging, older men, body composition, sympathetic activity, age-related metabolic decline, fat mass
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Body Composition, Body Weight, Diet, Hormones, Humans, Male, Metabolism, Middle Aged, Norepinephrine, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Education and Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review