Cited by 115Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Resistance Training in the Treatment of Diabetes and Obesity: MECHANISMS AND OUTCOMES

Tresierras, Mark A., Balady, Gary J.·2009·Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention

Abstract

In Brief Resistance exercise training (RET) is gaining broad acceptance as a complement to endurance exercise in the treatment of cardiovascular risk factors. This article reviews the most current and reliable literature regarding the biological mechanisms and potential clinical effectiveness of RET in the treatment of 2 major cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes and obesity, obtained from human subject studies found by querying MEDLINE Plus/Ovid literature search system for the years 1950–2008. RET appears to enhance insulin sensitivity and improve glucose tolerance in a wide range of study groups. In addition, studies have shown that improved glucose uptake is not a mere consequence of the typical increase in fat-free mass associated with RET but is likely a result of qualitative changes in resistance-trained muscle. There is also substantial evidence that regular RET can effectively alter body composition in both men and women. It has been shown to increase total fat-free mass, muscular strength, and resting metabolic rate, and preferentially mobilize the visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in the abdominal region. The studies presented in this review demonstrate that RET should remain an important focus of translational research, where clinical trials of RET encourage the performance of mechanistic studies and where mechanistic studies lead to further clinical trials. Resistance training is gaining broad acceptance as a complement to endurance exercise in the treatment of cardiovascular risk factors. This review focuses on the mechanisms through which resistance training affects glucose intolerance, diabetes, and obesity, and the outcome studies that demonstrate potential clinical benefit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hcr.0b013e318199ff69

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tresierras, M. A., & Balady, G. J.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
Published
2009-03
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
67-75
ISSN
1932-7501 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047004813
Cited by
115
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
resistance training, diabetes mellitus, obesity, insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance, glucose uptake, fat-free mass, body composition, visceral adipose tissue, subcutaneous adipose tissue, resting metabolic rate, muscle strength, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Obesity, Exercise, Glucose Intolerance, Caloric Restriction, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review