Cited by 199Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Effect of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training alone in individuals with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis

Marzolini, Susan, Oh, Paul I, Brooks, Dina·2012·European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resistance training (RT) has only a permissive role as an adjunct to aerobic training (AT) in cardiac rehabilitation. DESIGN AND METHODS: To compare the effect of AT with combined RT and AT (CT) we searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, PreMedline, SPORT DISCUS, CINAHL (from the earliest date available to October 2009) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), examining effects of CT versus AT on body composition, cardiovascular fitness (VO(2peak)), strength, and quality-of-life (QOL) in coronary artery disease (CAD) (excluding heart failure). Two reviewers selected studies independently. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the study criteria (229 AT patients, 275 CT patients). Compared with AT, CT decreased percent body fat by -2.3% (WMD (weighted mean difference); 95% CI: -3.59 to -1.02), decreased trunk fat (SMD (standardized mean difference): -0.56; 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.15) and increased fat-free mass by 0.9 kg (WMD; 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.36) in three studies (n = 106). Similarly CT was associated with larger increases in lower body strength (seven studies, n = 225, SMD: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.04) and upper body strength (eight studies, n = 262, SMD: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.38). Compared to AT, CT improved peak work capacity (three studies, n = 92, SMD: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.31) and there was a trend for CT to increase VO(2peak) by 0.41 ml/kg/min (nine studies, n = 399, WMD; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.88). Qualitative analysis of QOL data favors CT. Study withdrawals were similar for AT (14.2% ± 13.2) and CT (11.5% ± 15.5). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: CT is more effective than AT in improving body composition, strength, and some indicators of cardiovascular fitness, and does not compromise study completion or safety when compared to AT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1741826710393197

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of aerobic exercises and resistance training is the most effective option compared with aerobic or resistance exercise alone for improving cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and muscle strength.

    “the combination of aerobic exercises and RT appears as the most effective option--compared with aerobic or RT exercise alone--for improving CRF, body composition, and muscle strength.80,81”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marzolini, S., Oh, P. I., & Brooks, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Marzolini, Susan
Venue
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2011-02-21
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
81-94
ISSN
  • 2047-4873 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-4881
OpenAlex
W2081661328
Cited by
199
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
resistance training, aerobic exercise, concurrent training, coronary artery disease, cardiac rehabilitation, body composition, fat-free mass, fat mass, peak oxygen uptake, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, quality of life, dropout rates, adverse events, exercise adherence, exercise duration, exercise frequency, exercise dose-response
MeSH terms
Aged, Body Composition, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Quality of Life, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review