The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual working memory in early development: a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective.
Abstract
In this article, we review the literature on the development of visual working memory (VWM). We focus on two major periods of development, infancy and early childhood. First, we discuss the innovative methods that have been devised to understand how the development of selective attention and perception provide the foundation of VWM abilities. We detail the behavioral and neural data associated with the development of VWM during infancy. Next, we discuss various signatures of development in VWM during early childhood in the context of spatial and featural memory processes. We focus on the developmental transition to more adult-like VWM properties. Finally, we discuss computational frameworks that have explained the complex patterns of behavior observed in VWM tasks from infancy to adulthood and attempt to explain links between measures of infant VWM and childhood VWM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This article covers the topic of visual working memory in early development.”
From The Ergonomics of Learning: A Proposed Update to Bloom’s Taxonomy (2025) · cites this paper as Buss, A. T., Ross-Sheehy, S., & Reynolds, G. D. (2018)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070
Working Memory: The Multiple-Component Model
Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999) · Models of Working Memory · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174909.005 · Cited by 1,374
Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., & Hecht, S. A. (2010) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.005 · Cited by 975
Interactions between attention and working memory
Awh, E., Vogel, E. K., & Oh, S.-H. (2006) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.023 · Cited by 883
The structure of executive function in 3-year-olds.
Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T., Nelson, J. M., Clark, C. A. C., Chevalier, N., & Espy, K. A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.008 · Cited by 776
Klingberg, T., Forssberg, H., & Westerberg, H. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902317205276 · Cited by 695
Knowing in the context of acting: the task dynamics of the A-not-B-error
Smith, L. B., Thelen, E., Titzer, R., & McLin, D. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.2.235 · Cited by 496
How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm
Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Morey, C. C., & Cowan, N. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0055-3 · Cited by 334
Research works printed but not linked: 119
- 10.1016/0166-4328(94)00143-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrn4025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/infa.12164 · DOI
- Baddeley AD, 1986, Working Memory
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.485 · DOI
- 10.1177/0963721414549187 · DOI
- 10.1006/nimg.2002.1170 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-0965(81)90002-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.05.017 · DOI
- Bauer PJ, 2009, The Development of Memory in Infancy and Childhood, 115
- 10.1167/9.10.7 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1158023 · DOI
- 10.1111/1469-8986.3940450 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01684.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0163-6383(99)00010-7 · DOI
- Bell MA, 1994, Human Behavior and the Developing Brain, 314
- 10.1207/s15326942dn3101_2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0030779 · DOI
- 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a72980 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01148.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.034 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199300563.001.0001 · DOI
- Colombo J, 1990, Individual Differences in Infancy: Reliability, Stability, Prediction
- 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00897.x · DOI
- 10.1038/386608a0 · DOI
- Cowan N, 1995, Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework
- 10.4324/9780203342398 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781118597705.ch10 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0510088103 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0020185 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.02.009 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/brcg.1999.1096 · DOI
- 10.2307/1130099 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb48904.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90001-9 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0034247 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.146.3644.668 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8624.00039 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1989.61.2.331 · DOI · Paper page
- Fuster JM, 1997, The Prefrontal Cortex: Anatomy, Physiology, and Neuropsychology of the Frontal Lobes
- 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90304-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90116-X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1131838 · DOI
- 10.1162/jocn.1990.2.2.81 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8721.ep11509740 · DOI
- 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.4.335 · DOI
- 10.1080/21622965.2016.1167497 · DOI
- 10.1111/desc.12335 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-7687.00290 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.002 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03196323 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1177/0963721415605831 · DOI
- 10.1111/cdev.12161 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305487.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1038/36846 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.04.002 · DOI
- 10.2307/1131742 · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.723 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00697 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506280802151480 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01782.x · DOI
- 10.1006/jecp.1995.1019 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03210419 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2407(03)31005-5 · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.836 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhv139 · DOI
- 10.1037/14043-004 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1999.81.4.1903 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.015 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.013.0063 · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.598 · DOI
- 10.1111/cdev.12982 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00015 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00222 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327078in0601_7 · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.22 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.03.009 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dr.2003.09.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.intell.2007.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00639.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00992.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0711295105 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0014538 · DOI
- 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1045 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0015794 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8624.00614 · DOI
- 10.1111/cdev.12150 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1111/mono.12249 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13414-016-1163-y · DOI
- 10.3758/s13414-015-0832-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.081 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0029856 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503007.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1996.75.1.454 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X01003910 · DOI
- 10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.30 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhh030 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature04171 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1997.78.5.2795 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.007 · DOI
- 10.1002/wcs.1343 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.064 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.039 · DOI
- 10.1167/4.12.11 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506280802478990 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.121 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06860 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Ergonomics of Learning: A Proposed Update to Bloom’s Taxonomy
Curtis, A., & Johansson, A. (2025) · Intersection: A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning · doi:10.61669/001c.142595
Metadata
- Authors
- Buss, A. T., Ross-Sheehy, S., & Reynolds, G. D.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
- ORCID
- Reynolds, Greg D.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2018-10-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1472-1483
- ISSN
- 0022-3077
- 1522-1598
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 10
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
