Cited by 776Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and TestingChild and Animal Learning Development

The structure of executive function in 3-year-olds.

Open access
Wiebe, Sandra A., Sheffield, Tiffany, Nelson, Jennifer Mize, Clark, Caron A.C., Chevalier, Nicolas, Espy, Kimberly Andrews·2011·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

Although the structure of executive function (EF) during adulthood is characterized by both unity and diversity, recent evidence suggests that preschool EF may be best described by a single factor. The latent structure of EF was examined in 228 3-year-olds using confirmatory factor analysis. Children completed a battery of executive tasks that differed in format and response requirements and in putative working memory and inhibitory control demands. Tasks appeared to be age appropriate, with adequate sensitivity across the range of performance and without floor or ceiling effects. Tests of the relative fit of several alternative models supported a single latent EF construct. Measurement invariance testing revealed less proficient EF in children at higher sociodemographic risk relative to those at lower risk and no differences between boys and girls. At 3years of age, when EF skills are emerging, EF appears to be a unitary, more domain-general process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.008

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assessment of executive function has a significant role in clinical practice, including early detection and intervention planning.

    “assessment of executive function plays a significant role in clinical practice, including early detection and intervention planning.40”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

    The paper’s introductory discussion (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) links understanding executive function in preschoolers to clinical symptoms and says it is critical for designing preventive interventions for children with early difficulties. It does not establish that executive-function assessment plays a significant role in clinical practice or early detection. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although the unitary or common process approach of executive functions as a model for young children has a lot of support, there is evidence that some components are dissociable.

    “Although the unitary or common process approach of EF as a model for young children has a lot of support (Garon et al., 2008; Wiebe et al., 2011; Brydges et al., 2012), there is evidence that some components are dissociable.”

    From Assessment of executive functions in school-aged children: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as Wiebe et al., 2011

  • Researchers have found several developmental differences in executive functions suggesting executive functions are more unidimensional in early development but become a multifactorial construct in adolescence and adulthood, and a single factor model of executive functions is not universally appropriate across development.

    “Researchers have also found several developmental differences in EF (e.g., Wiebe et al., 2011; Brydges et al., 2012) suggesting EF are more unidimensional in early development but becomes a multifactorial construct in adolescence and adulthood and asserting that a single factor model of EF is not universally appropriate across development.”

    From Assessment of executive functions in school-aged children: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as Wiebe et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T., Nelson, J. M., Clark, C. A. C., Chevalier, N., & Espy, K. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Wiebe, Sandra A.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
436-452
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079516150
Cited by
776
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 26
FWCI
31.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH065668, R01MH065668)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA014661, R21DA024769, R01DA023653, DA023653, DA024769, R01DA014661)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
executive function, preschool children, three-year-old children, latent structure, one-factor model, domain generality, working memory, inhibitory control, measurement invariance, sociodemographic risk factors, sex differences
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Internal-External Control, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Task Performance and Analysis, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review