The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modulating Neural Networks With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applied Over the Dorsal Premotor and Primary Motor Cortices
Abstract
Our study uses the combined transcranial magnetic stimulation/positron emission tomography (TMS/PET) method for elucidating neural connectivity of the human motor system. We first altered motor excitability by applying low-frequency repetitive TMS over two cortical motor regions in separate experiments: the dorsal premotor and primary motor cortices. We then assessed the consequences of modulating motor excitability by applying single-pulse TMS over the primary motor cortex and measuring: 1) muscle responses with electromyography and 2) cerebral blood flow with PET. Low-frequency repetitive stimulation reduced muscle responses to a similar degree in both experiments. To map networks of brain regions in which activity changes reflected modulation of motor excitability, we generated t-statistical maps of correlations between reductions in muscle response and differences in cerebral blood flow. Low-frequency repetitive stimulation altered neural activity differently in both experiments. Neural modulation occurred in multiple brain regions after dorsal premotor cortex stimulation; these included motor regions in the frontal cortex as well as more associational regions in the parietal and prefrontal cortices. In contrast, neural modulation occurred in a smaller number of brain regions after primary motor cortex stimulation, many of these confined to the motor system. These findings are consistent with the known differences between the dorsal premotor and primary motor cortices in the extent of cortico-cortical anatomical connectivity in the monkey.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space
Collins, D. L., Neelin, P., Peters, T. M., & Evans, A. C. (1994) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005 · Cited by 3,431 · cited 4×
“5-T system and transformed these images into standardized stereotaxic space using an automatic feature-matching algorithm (Collins et al. 1994).”
MethodInfluentialFunctional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop
Parent, A., & Hazrati, L.-N. (1995) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(94)00007-c · Cited by 2,161
Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation
Chen, R., Classen, J., Gerloff, C., Celnik, P., Wassermann, E. M., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.5.1398 · Cited by 2,128 · cited 1×
“Typically, low-stimulation frequencies of 1 to 2 Hz induce inhibitory effects (e.g., Chen et al. 1997; Gerschlager et al. 2001; Maeda et al. 2000; Muellbacher et al. 2000) and high-stimulation frequencies between 5 and 20 Hz induce facilitory effects (e.g., Maeda et al. 2000; Pascual-Leone et al.…”
BackgroundMotor Areas of the Medial Wall: A Review of Their Location and Functional Activation
Picard, N., & Strick, P. L. (1996) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/6.3.342 · Cited by 1,712
Barbas, H. (2000) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(99)00245-2 · Cited by 664
Maeda, F., Keenan, J. P., Tormos, J. M., Topka, H., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210000432 · Cited by 651
Synaptic development of the cerebral cortex: implications for learning, memory and mental illness
(1994) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60543-9 · Cited by 565
Schlaug, G., Knorr, U., & Seitz, R. (1994) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00233989 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain
Hoogendam, J. M., Ramakers, G. M. J., & Di Lazzaro, V. (2010) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2009.10.005 · Cited by 669
Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols
Ziemann, U., Paulus, W., Nitsche, M. A., Pascual-Leone, A., Byblow, W. D., Berardelli, A., Siebner, H. R., Classen, J., Cohen, L. G., & Rothwell, J. C. (2008) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.006 · Cited by 639
Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr033 · Cited by 632
Postuma, R. B., & Dagher, A. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj088 · Cited by 579
Bestmann, S., Baudewig, J., Siebner, H. R., Rothwell, J. C., & Frahm, J. (2004) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03277.x · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Chouinard, P. A., Van Der Werf, Y. D., Leonard, G., & Paus, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1071-1083
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2054809641
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modulating Neural Networks With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applied Over the Dorsal Premotor and Primary Motor Cortices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.01105.2002
- The paper
- Chouinard, P. A., Van Der Werf, Y. D., Leonard, G., & Paus, T. (2003). Modulating Neural Networks With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applied Over the Dorsal Premotor and Primary Motor Cortices. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01105.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.