Cited by 18Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Remapping nociceptive stimuli into a peripersonal reference frame is spatially locked to the stimulated limb

Open access
De Paepe, Annick L., Crombez, Geert, Legrain, Valéry·2017·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

The localization of harmful stimuli approaching our body is essential for survival. Here we investigated whether the mapping of nociceptive stimuli is based on a spatial representation that is anchored to the stimulated limb. In three experiments, we measured the effect of unilateral visual stimuli on the perceived temporal order of nociceptive stimuli, applied to each hand. Crucially, the position of the hands and the visual stimuli was manipulated, so that visual and nociceptive stimuli occurred in an adjacent or non-adjacent spatial position. Temporal order judgments of nociceptive stimuli were biased in favor of the stimulus applied to the hand most adjacent to the visual stimulus, irrespective to their positions in space. This suggests that the ability to determine the position of a nociceptive stimulus on a specific body area is based on a peripersonal representation of the stimulated limb following it during limb displacement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.015

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Paepe, A. L., Crombez, G., & Legrain, V.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
101
Pages
121-131
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613852532
Cited by
18
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Foundation Flanders (FWO12/ASP/080)
  • Fund for Scientific Research of the French Speaking Community of Belgium
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
nociception, peripersonal space, representation of the body, temporal order judgment, body schema, multisensory integration
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Hand, Humans, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Time Perception, Visual Perception, Young Adult, Pain Perception, Nociception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review