Cited by 647Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesMedicinal Plant ResearchAfrican Botany and Ecology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Traditional Medicines in Africa: An Appraisal of Ten Potent African Medicinal Plants

Open access
Mahomoodally, M. Fawzi·2013·Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Abstract

The use of medicinal plants as a fundamental component of the African traditional healthcare system is perhaps the oldest and the most assorted of all therapeutic systems. In many parts of rural Africa, traditional healers prescribing medicinal plants are the most easily accessible and affordable health resource available to the local community and at times the only therapy that subsists. Nonetheless, there is still a paucity of updated comprehensive compilation of promising medicinal plants from the African continent. The major focus of the present review is to provide an updated overview of 10 promising medicinal plants from the African biodiversity which have short- as well as long-term potential to be developed as future phytopharmaceuticals to treat and/or manage panoply of infectious and chronic conditions. In this endeavour, key scientific databases have been probed to investigate trends in the rapidly increasing number of scientific publications on African traditional medicinal plants. Within the framework of enhancing the significance of traditional African medicinal plants, aspects such as traditional use, phytochemical profile, in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies and also future challenges pertaining to the use of these plants have been explored.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2013/617459

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 119 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 1985, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 63, 965
  2. 2005, African Journal of Biotechnology, 4, 128
  3. 2011, Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 5, 163
  4. 2012, Journal Pharmaceutical Research, 5, 4934
  5. 2011, Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 5, 163
  6. 10.1016/j.jep.2008.05.029 · DOI
  7. 1974, Revue d"elevage et de medecine veterinaire des pays tropicaux, 27, 203
  8. 1990, Bolgarskoi Akademii Nauk, 43, 65
  9. 2010, Records of Natural Products, 4, 1
  10. 2012, Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 57, 603
  11. 2006, Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 80, 138
  12. 2004, BioFactors, 21, 149
  13. 1992, Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 30, 889
  14. 2007, Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 45, 425
  15. 1830, South African Quarterly Journal, 27
  16. 1995, Deutsche Apotheker Zeitung, 135, 15
  17. 1999, Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin, 25, 11
  18. 2004, Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology, 3, 39
  19. 1981, Planta Medica, 42, 205
  20. 1987, Fitoterapia, 58, 387
  21. 1981, Acta Biology Medicinal Germany, 41, 1229
  22. 2002, Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 66, 1576, 10.1271/bbb.66.1576 · DOI
  23. 2008, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  24. 2004, Phytopharmaka und Phytotherapie, Abstract, 15
  25. 2005, Pharmaceutical Journal, 275, 790
  26. 2000, Current Topics in Phytochemistry, 3, 77
  27. 2010, The African Health Monitor, 13, 25

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 647

Metadata

Authors
Mahomoodally, M. F.
Affiliations
University of Mauritius (MU)
Corresponding author
Mahomoodally, M. Fawzi
Venue
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013
Volume
2013
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 1741-427X (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-4288
OpenAlex
W2157525511
Cited by
647
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › African Botany and Ecology Studies
Keywords
African medicinal plants, traditional medicine, herbal medicine, traditional healers, phytochemical composition, traditional uses, in vitro and in vivo studies, infectious diseases, chronic disease, African biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review