Cited by 633D Printing in Biomedical ResearchBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A 3D-Printed PLCL Scaffold Coated with Collagen Type I and Its Biocompatibility

Open access

Abstract

Scaffolds play an important role in tissue engineering and their structure and biocompatibility have great influence on cell behaviors. In this study, poly(l-lactide-co- ε -caprolactone) (PLCL) scaffolds were printed by a 3D printing technology, low-temperature deposition manufacturing (LDM), and then PLCL scaffolds were treated by alkali and coated with collagen type I (COLI). The scaffolds were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), porosity test, mechanical test, and infrared spectroscopy. The prepared PLCL and PLCL-COLI scaffolds had three-dimensional (3D) porous structure and they not only have macropores but also have micropores in the deposited lines. Although the mechanical property of PLCL-COLI was slightly lower than that of PLCL scaffold, the hydrophilicity of PLCL-COLI was significantly enhanced. Rabbit articular chondrocytes were extracted and were identified as chondrocytes by toluidine blue staining. To study the biocompatibility, the chondrocytes were seeded on scaffolds for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days. MTT assay showed that the proliferation of chondrocytes on PLCL-COLI scaffold was better than that on PLCL scaffold. And the morphology of cells on PLCL-COLI after 1-day culture was much better than that on PLCL. This 3D-printed PLCL scaffold coated with COLI shows a great potential application in tissue engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2018/5147156

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PLCL porous scaffolds prepared via LTD printing have surfaces containing a microporous structure with a size range of 6.9-12.1 μm.

    “The SEM images of the scaffolds show that their surfaces contain a microporous structure with a size range of 6.9–12.1 μm [108].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1002/mabi.201500014 · DOI
  2. 2010, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, 92, 2220, 10.2106/JBJS.J.00049 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/1602400214 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000115 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.027 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1177/0885328216638587 · DOI
  7. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2008, Manufacturing Technology and Machine Tool, 71
  9. 10.1002/term.2038 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/bip.21701 · DOI
  11. 10.1155/2013/412745 · DOI
  12. 10.1155/2012/579141 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0883911508095517 · DOI
  14. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.522.97 · DOI
  15. 2012, Journal of Xinjiang Medical University, 35, 755
  16. 10.3724/SP.J.1077.2011.00012 · DOI
  17. 2006, Journal of Tsinghua University, 46, 1357
  18. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00071-4 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0928-4931(01)00313-7 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00067-4 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s10856-007-3281-5 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.022 · DOI
  23. 2017, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
  24. 10.2217/rme.13.29 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s40883-015-0002-3 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981215)42:4<540::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.212 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s10856-013-5129-5 · DOI
  29. 10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0422 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.12.009 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10616-015-9895-4 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/la202255w · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.08.031 · DOI
  35. 10.5301/ijao.5000516 · DOI
  36. 10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025020 · DOI
  37. 10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0200 · DOI
  38. 10.1039/C6BM00068A · DOI
  39. 10.1080/09205063.2016.1217607 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
He, Y., Liu, W., Guan, L., Chen, J., Duan, L., Jia, Z., Huang, J., Li, W., Liu, J., Xiong, J., Liu, L., & Wang, D.
Affiliations
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Department of Orthopedics, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, Guangdong 529500, China
  • Department of Orthopedics, The First Hospital Affiliated to Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518035, China
Corresponding author
Wang, Daping
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018
Volume
2018
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
OpenAlex
W2789408749
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81572198, JCYJ20160425104858256, 201605006)
  • Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee (81572198, JCYJ20160425104858256, 201605006)
  • Shenzhen Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission (81572198, JCYJ20160425104858256, 201605006)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
3D printing, porous scaffolds, hydrophilicity, chondrocyte proliferation, biocompatibility, articular cartilage tissue engineering, porosity, mechanical properties
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Polyesters, Rabbits, Porosity, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Chondrocytes, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Collagen Type I, Sus scrofa, Cell Shape, Tissue Scaffolds, Elastic Modulus, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Optical Imaging, Printing, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review