Cited by 8Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareMuscle activation and electromyography studiesEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Classification and Assessment of the Patelar Reflex Response through Biomechanical Measures

Open access
Salazar-Muñoz, Yolocuauhtli, López-Pérez, G. Angelina, García-Caballero, Blanca E., Muñoz-Rios, Refugio, Ruano-Calderón, Luis A., Trujillo, Leonardo·2019·Journal of Healthcare Engineering

Abstract

Clinical evaluation of the patellar reflex is one of the most frequent diagnostic methods used by physicians and medical specialists. However, this test is usually elicited and diagnosed manually. In this work, we develop a device specifically designed to induce the patellar reflex and measure the angle and angular velocity of the leg during the course of the reflex test. We have recorded the response of 106 volunteers with the aim of finding a recognizable pattern in the responses that can allow us to classify each reflex according to the scale of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). In order to elicit the patellar reflex, a hammer is attached to a specially designed pendulum, with a controlled impact force. All volunteer test subjects sit at a specific height, performing the Jendrassik maneuver during the test, and the medical staff evaluates the response in accordance with the NINDS scale. The data acquisition system is integrated by using a tapping sensor, an inertial measurement unit, a control unit, and a graphical user interface (GUI). The GUI displays the sensor behavior in real time. The sample rate is 5 kHz, and the control unit is configured for a continuous sample mode. The measured signals are processed and filtered to reduce high-frequency noise and digitally stored. After analyzing the signals, several domain-specific features are proposed to allow us to differentiate between various NINDS groups using machine learning classifiers. The results show that it is possible to automatically classify the patellar reflex into a NINDS scale using the proposed biomechanical measurements and features.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2019/1614963

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [19]Salazar-Muñoz Y. Ruano-Calderon L. A. Leyva J. A. Martinez O. S. Patellar reflex measurement system with tapping force controlled Proceedings of the XIII Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2013 September 2013 Seville, Spain
  2. [20]Salazar-Muñoz Y. García-Caballero B. Muñoz-Ríos R. López-Pérez G. A. Ruano-Calderon L. A. Angular rate measurement in the assessment of patellar reflex Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Power Electronics (CIEP) June 2016 Guanajuato, Mexico
  3. [24]Avila‐Chaurand R. Prado-León L. González-Muñoz E. Dimensiones antropométricas de la población latinoamericana: México, Cuba, Colombia, Chile, México, 2nd edition, 2007
  4. [25]Theodoridis S. Koutroumbas K. Pattern Recognition 2008 4th Cambridge, MA, USA Academic Press
  5. [26]Freeman W. J. Quiroga R. Q. /maging Brain Function With EEG 2013 1st New York, NY, USA Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salazar-Muñoz, Y., López-Pérez, G. A., García-Caballero, B. E., Muñoz-Rios, R., Ruano-Calderón, L. A., & Trujillo, L.
Affiliations
  • Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Durango, C.P. 34080, Durango, DGO, Mexico
  • Durango Institute of Technology (MX)
  • Servicios de Salud del Estado de Durango, Hospital General 450, C.P. 34206, Durango, DGO, Mexico
  • Tecnológico Nacional de México (MX)
Venue
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-09
Volume
2019
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 2040-2295 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-2309
OpenAlex
W2961775041
Cited by
8
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Healthcare Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Secretary of Public Education of Mexico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
patellar reflex, knee joint angle, angular velocity, inertial measurement unit, Jendrassik maneuver, biomechanical features, machine learning classification, neuromuscular disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer Graphics, Female, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Reflex, Stress, Mechanical, United States, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Patellar Ligament, Young Adult, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U.S.), Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review