Cited by 8Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Characterisation of the patellar tendon reflex in cerebral palsy children using motion analysis

O’Sullivan, Rory, Kiernan, Damien, Walsh, Michael, O’Brien, Tim, Elhassan, Yahya·2016·Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

Abstract

Background The patellar tendon reflex (PTR) is an important spinal reflex and an important diagnostic tool assessing neurological disturbances. Reflexes are conveniently assessed but quantifying the response can be subjective. Motion analysis is commonly used to assess gait kinematics in a variety of populations. It can be used to objectively assess the PTR with the advantage that standard technique and hammer can be used without the need for bulky apparatus or fixing the subject position.Aim To compare the PTR in 15 cerebral palsy (CP) children with age and height matched controls.Methods EMG reflex latency in the rectus femoris was assessed using a Noraxon 2400T unit. Knee movement latency, knee angular displacement and peak angular velocity were captured using the CODA mpx 30 system.Results EMG reflex latency was significantly reduced in CP compared to control limbs (13.11 versus 18.11 ms; p < 0.01) confirming a 'brisk' response in this population. The kinematic data found that while knee angular displacement was significantly reduced in CP (12.82° versus 20.06°; p < 0.01) there was no significant difference in movement latency or peak angular velocity compared to controls.Conclusions Subjective evaluation of the PTR relies mostly on change in knee angle. Using motion analysis we have confirmed a difference in this variable in CP compared to controls. We have also shown reduced reflex latency associated with a brisk reflex. Knee movement latency and peak angular velocity did not differentiate CP from normal. Further examination of the knee angular response of the PTR is warranted in CP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11845-015-1369-3

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A motion capture system was used to demonstrate the knee angle increase dependent on the tapping force in healthy participants and its usability for cerebral palsy patients.

    “A motion capture system was also used to demonstrate the knee angle increase dependent on the tapping force in healthy participants15,16 and its usability for cerebral palsy patients31.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Sullivan, R., Kiernan, D., Walsh, M., O’Brien, T., & Elhassan, Y.
Affiliations
Central Remedial Clinic (IE)
Corresponding author
O’Sullivan, Rory
Venue
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)
Published
2015-10-15
Volume
185
Issue
4
Pages
813-817
ISSN
  • 0021-1265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-4362
OpenAlex
W2165231407
Cited by
8
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
patellar reflex, cerebral palsy, children, reflex latency, peak angular velocity, spinal reflexes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Patella, Reflex, Stretch, Case-Control Studies, Range of Motion, Articular, Patellar Ligament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review