The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Helicobacter pylori and Esophageal Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
We conducted this meta-analysis to examine the association between Helicobacter pylori and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We searched the PubMed database, the ISI database, and the references of the selected articles. Case-control or nested case-control studies were selected if they used serology or endoscopic methods to detect H. pylori in the stomach and if control subjects were not restricted to upper gastrointestinal tract cancer or peptic ulcer disease patients. A total of 19 studies were used for this analysis. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method. Q statistics and I2 statistics were calculated to examine heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted by CagA status. For EAC, the summary OR (95% CI) was 0.56 (0.46-0.68). There was little heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 15%). Further analysis showed that colonization with CagA-positive strains was inversely associated with EAC risk (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.62) but colonization with CagA-negative strains was not (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76-1.53). For esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the summary OR (95% CI) was 1.10 (0.78-1.55). However, there was substantial heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 73%), with statistically significant associations in both directions. Our results suggest an inverse association between CagA-positive H. pylori colonization and risk of EAC. The prominent decline of H. pylori colonization in the past few decades may be partly responsible for the recent increase in EAC incidence in Western countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration
Marshall, B., & Warren, J. R. (1984) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91816-6 · Cited by 5,509
Kamangar, F., Dores, G. M., & Anderson, W. F. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.2308 · Cited by 3,434
Self-citationSymptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux as a Risk Factor for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Lagergren, J., Bergström, R., Lindgren, A., & Nyrén, O. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199903183401101 · Cited by 3,020
Suerbaum, S., & Michetti, P. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra020542 · Cited by 2,987
Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101 · Cited by 2,225
Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States
Devesa, S. S., Blot, W. J., & Fraumeni, J. F. (1998) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981115)83:10<2049::aid-cncr1>3.0.co;2-2 · Cited by 2,115
Helicobacter and Cancer Collaborative Group (2001) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.49.3.347 · Cited by 1,038
Cited by
Global cancer statistics, 2012
Torre, L. A., Bray, F., Siegel, R. L., Ferlay, J., Lortet‐Tieulent, J., & Jemal, A. (2015) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21262 · Cited by 26,850
The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease
Cho, I., & Blaser, M. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3182 · Cited by 3,449
A review of human carcinogens—Part B: biological agents
Bouvard, V., Baan, R., Straif, K., Grosse, Y., Secretan, B., Ghissassi, F. E., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., Guha, N., Freeman, C., Galichet, L., et al. (2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70096-8 · Cited by 2,935
Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends
Jemal, A., Center, M. M., DeSantis, C., & Ward, E. M. (2010) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0437 · Cited by 2,778
Pennathur, A., Gibson, M. K., Jobe, B. A., & Luketich, J. D. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60643-6 · Cited by 2,390
Metadata
- Authors
- Islami, F., & Kamangar, F.
- Venue
- Cancer Prevention Research
- Published
- 2008-10-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 329-338
- ISSN
- 1940-6207 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6215
- OpenAlex
- W2120822922
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Helicobacter pylori and Esophageal Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-08-0109
- The paper
- Islami, F., & Kamangar, F. (2008). Helicobacter pylori and Esophageal Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis. Cancer Prevention Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-08-0109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.