Cited by 180Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysChromatin Remodeling and CancerProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Enhancer Remodeling during Adaptive Bypass to MEK Inhibition Is Attenuated by Pharmacologic Targeting of the P-TEFb Complex

Open access
Zawistowski, Jon S., Bevill, Samantha M., Goulet, Daniel R., Stuhlmiller, Timothy J., Beltran, Adriana S., Olivares-Quintero, Jose F., Singh, Darshan, Sciaky, Noah +17 more·2017·Cancer Discovery

Abstract

Targeting the dysregulated BRAF–MEK–ERK pathway in cancer has increasingly emerged in clinical trial design. Despite clinical responses in specific cancers using inhibitors targeting BRAF and MEK, resistance develops often involving nongenomic adaptive bypass mechanisms. Inhibition of MEK1/2 by trametinib in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) induced dramatic transcriptional responses, including upregulation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) comparing tumor samples before and after one week of treatment. In preclinical models, MEK inhibition induced genome-wide enhancer formation involving the seeding of BRD4, MED1, H3K27 acetylation, and p300 that drives transcriptional adaptation. Inhibition of the P-TEFb–associated proteins BRD4 and CBP/p300 arrested enhancer seeding and RTK upregulation. BRD4 bromodomain inhibitors overcame trametinib resistance, producing sustained growth inhibition in cells, xenografts, and syngeneic mouse TNBC models. Pharmacologic targeting of P-TEFb members in conjunction with MEK inhibition by trametinib is an effective strategy to durably inhibit epigenomic remodeling required for adaptive resistance. Significance: Widespread transcriptional adaptation to pharmacologic MEK inhibition was observed in TNBC patient tumors. In preclinical models, MEK inhibition induces dramatic genome-wide modulation of chromatin, in the form of de novo enhancer formation and enhancer remodeling. Pharmacologic targeting of P-TEFb complex members at enhancers is an effective strategy to durably inhibit such adaptation. Cancer Discov; 7(3); 302–21. ©2017 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 235

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-16-0653

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pretreatment biopsies matched to post-treatment surgical specimens showed overall concordance of transcriptional kinase response to trametinib, with FRK highest mean increase and cytoplasmic BMX highest mean decrease.

    “Pretreatment biopsies matched to post-treatment surgical specimens showed overall concordance of the transcriptional kinase response to trametinib, with FRK (Tchem) exhibiting the highest mean increase and cytoplasmic BMX (also Tchem) exhibiting the highest mean decrease among patients in response to a 7-day drug treatment.”

    From Unexplored therapeutic opportunities in the human genome (2018) · cites this paper as [75]

    The Results section, “MEK inhibition induces a transcriptomic/kinome response in patient TNBC tumors” (page unavailable), reports concordant transcriptional responses in four matched basal-like tumors, with FRK showing the highest mean increase and BMX the highest mean decrease after seven days of trametinib. It does not describe BMX as cytoplasmic or label FRK and BMX “Tchem”; it also limits the concordance finding to patients 1, 2, 3, and 5, rather than all patients. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In TNBC tumours, members of the understudied Tbio and Tdark kinome are co-regulated transcriptionally with Tclin and Tchem kinases in a dynamic adaptive response to targeted inhibition.

    “These findings demonstrate that in TNBC tumours in patients, members of the understudied Tbio and Tdark kinome are co-regulated transcriptionally with kinases from the Tclin and Tchem category, in a dynamic adaptive response to targeted inhibition.”

    From Unexplored therapeutic opportunities in the human genome (2018) · cites this paper as [75]

    The Results section, “MEK inhibition induces a transcriptomic/kinome response in patient TNBC tumors” (page unavailable), reports transcriptional changes in multiple kinases after seven days of trametinib treatment. It does not classify those kinases as Tbio, Tdark, Tclin, or Tchem or establish co-regulation between those categories, so that specific part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among kinases transcriptionally altered in TNBC tumours were understudied kinases MRCK-γ, PRKACB, STK32B and LTK.

    “Among the kinases transcriptionally altered in the TNBC tumours were several understudied kinases, including MRCK-γ (also known as CDC42BPG), PRKACB, STK32B and leukocyte tyrosine kinase receptor (LTK).”

    From Unexplored therapeutic opportunities in the human genome (2018) · cites this paper as [75]

    The Results section on distinct basal-like and claudin-low kinome signatures identifies CDC42BPG (MRCK-γ) as upregulated in both patient TNBC tumours and cell lines after MEK inhibition. The paper also reports broader transcriptional changes in tumour kinases, but our copy does not identify PRKACB, STK32B or LTK as altered, or describe the listed kinases as understudied (pages not provided). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A recent clinical study assessed trametinib response in TNBC patients.

    “The potential therapeutic importance of Tbio and Tdark kinases in the kinome is highlighted by a recent clinical study that assessed the response to trametinib, a MEK1 and MEK2 inhibitor, in TNBC patients75.”

    From Unexplored therapeutic opportunities in the human genome (2018) · cites this paper as [75]

  • BET proteins facilitate chromatin remodeling and transcriptional adaptation necessary for establishing the DTP state in response to MEK and PI3K inhibitors in breast cancer models, which can be prevented by the BET inhibitor JQ1.

    “Several studies have revealed that BET proteins facilitate chromatin remodeling and transcriptional adaptation necessary for establishing the DTP state in response to MEK and PI3K inhibitors in breast cancer models, which can be prevented by the BET inhibitor JQ1 [66,74].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zawistowski, J. S., Bevill, S. M., Goulet, D. R., Stuhlmiller, T. J., Beltran, A. S., Olivares-Quintero, J. F., Singh, D., Sciaky, N., Parker, J. S., Rashid, N. U., Chen, X., Duncan, J. S., Whittle, M. C., Angus, S. P., Velarde, S. H., Golitz, B. T., He, X., Santos, C., Darr, D. B., Gallagher, K., Graves, L. M., Perou, C. M., Carey, L. A., Earp, H. S., & Johnson, G. L.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • 1Department of Pharmacology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • 5Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Corresponding author
Johnson, Gary L.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2017-03-01
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
302-321
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2576619896
Cited by
180
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Susan G. Komen for the Cure
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA058223, P30CA016086)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM101141, F31GM116534)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
MEK inhibition, trametinib, triple-negative breast cancer, adaptive resistance, enhancer remodeling, CBP/p300, transcriptional adaptation, chromatin remodeling, H3K27 acetylation
MeSH terms
Discoidin Domain Receptor 1, Bromodomain Containing Proteins, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Azepines, Drug Synergism, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Female, Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Nuclear Proteins, Pyridones, Pyrimidinones, Transcription Factors, Triazoles, Mice, SCID, Cell Cycle Proteins, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, DNA Methylation, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, RNA Interference, Positive Transcriptional Elongation Factor B, Epigenesis, Genetic, Cell Line, Tumor, MAP Kinase Kinase 1, MAP Kinase Kinase 2, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review