Cited by 1,000Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesImmune cells in cancer

Tumor Microenvironment Characterization in Gastric Cancer Identifies Prognostic and Immunotherapeutically Relevant Gene Signatures

Zeng, Dongqiang, Li, Meiyi, Zhou, Rui, Zhang, Jingwen, Sun, Huiying, Shi, Min, Bin, Jianping, Liao, Yulin +2 more·2019·Cancer Immunology Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Tumor microenvironment (TME) cells constitute a vital element of tumor tissue. Increasing evidence has elucidated their clinicopathologic significance in predicting outcomes and therapeutic efficacy. Nonetheless, no studies have reported a systematic analysis of cellular interactions in the TME. In this study, we comprehensively estimated the TME infiltration patterns of 1,524 gastric cancer patients and systematically correlated the TME phenotypes with genomic characteristics and clinicopathologic features of gastric cancer using two proposed computational algorithms. Three TME phenotypes were defined, and the TMEscore was constructed using principal component analysis algorithms. The high TMEscore subtype was characterized by immune activation and response to virus and IFNγ. Activation of transforming growth factor β, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and angiogenesis pathways were observed in the low TMEscore subtype, which are considered T-cell suppressive and may be responsible for significantly worse prognosis in gastric cancer [hazard ratio (HR), 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33–0.54; P < 0.001]. Multivariate analysis revealed that the TMEscore was an independent prognostic biomarker, and its value in predicting immunotherapeutic outcomes was also confirmed (IMvigor210 cohort: HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46–0.89; P = 0.008; GSE78220 cohort: HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07–0.89; P = 0.021). Depicting a comprehensive landscape of the TME characteristics of gastric cancer may, therefore, help to interpret the responses of gastric tumors to immunotherapies and provide new strategies for the treatment of cancers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-18-0436

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, D., Li, M., Zhou, R., Zhang, J., Sun, H., Shi, M., Bin, J., Liao, Y., Rao, J., & Liao, W.
Affiliations
  • Nanfang Hospital (CN)
  • Southern Medical University (CN)
Venue
Cancer Immunology Research
Published
2019-05-01
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
737-750
ISSN
  • 2326-6066 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-6074
OpenAlex
W2920600229
Cited by
986
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 164 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 251 · 2021: 162 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 9
FWCI
53.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Immunology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772580)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
Keywords
gastric cancer, tumor microenvironment, prognostic factors, immunotherapy response, immune cell infiltration, T cell suppression, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, TGF-beta signaling, IFN-gamma response, gene expression signatures, IMvigor210
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Algorithms, Humans, Immunotherapy, Phenotype, Prognosis, Stomach Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Tumor Microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review