Cited by 187Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Predictive Accuracy of MCI Subtypes for Alzheimer’s Disease and Vascular Dementia in Subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study

Open access
Rasquin, S.M.C., Lodder, J., Visser, P.J., Lousberg, R., Verhey, F.R.J.·2005·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic accuracy of different subtypes of mild cognitive impairment (MCI): amnestic MCI, multiple domain MCI, and single non-memory domain MCI, for the development of Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD). Patients: Nondemented patients from a memory clinic cohort (n = 118), and a stroke cohort (n = 80, older than 55 years and with a cognitive impairment). Results: ‘Multiple domain MCI’ had the highest sensitivity for both AD (80.8%) and VaD (100%), and ‘amnestic MCI’ had the highest specificity (85.9% for AD, 100% for VaD). The positive predictive value was low for all subtypes (0.0–32.7%), whereas the negative predictive value was high (72.8–100%). Discussion: The subtype ‘multiple domain MCI’ has high sensitivity in identifying people at risk for developing AD or VaD. The predictive accuracy of the MCI subtypes was similar for both AD and VaD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000082662

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rasquin, S. M. C., Lodder, J., Visser, P. J., Lousberg, R., & Verhey, F. R. J.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Neurology, Inc (US)
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2005
Volume
19
Issue
2-3
Pages
113-119
ISSN
  • 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9824
OpenAlex
W2091159443
Cited by
187
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, MCI subtypes, amnestic MCI, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, dementia prediction, prognostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, stroke patients
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Amnesia, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Retention, Psychology, Risk, Verbal Learning, Dementia, Vascular, Dementia, Multi-Infarct, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review