Cited by 82Dental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis researchdental development and anomalies

Dental Caries and Microbial Acid Production in Twins

Bretz, W.A., Corby, P.M.A., Hart, T.C., Costa, S., Coelho, M.Q., Weyant, R.J., Robinson, M., Schork, N.J.·2005·Caries Research

Abstract

Objective: To determine the relative contribution of genetic and environmental stimuli on dental caries traits and microbial acid production in a twin model. Methods: Dental caries examinations and microbial acid production assays were performed on 388 pairs of twins 1.5–8 years old from the city of Montes Claros, Brazil. Genotyping 8 polymorphic DNA markers determined zygosity. Caries exams followed NIDCR criteria modified to distinguish white spot lesions from cavitated lesions. Surface-based caries prevalence rates (SBCPR) were computed and lesion severity was determined by a weighted index (LSI). Biofilm samples were collected from the tongue using a lactic acid indicator swab. Assay scores were categorized based on acid formation as 1 = low, 2 = medium, and 3 = high. Heritability analyses were performed using the SOLAR software package. Results: Heritability estimates for SBCPRs, LSI and for microbial acid production were H = 76.3 (p < 0.001), H = 70.6 (p < 0.001), H = 16.2 (p = 0.0078), respectively. Treating microbial acid production as a covariate in the SBCPR and LSI models did not significantly alter the heritability estimates, i.e. H = 76.5 (p < 0.001) and H = 70.8 (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: These results suggest that variation in dental caries surface traits has a significant genetic contribution and that microbial acid production is modulated by the environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000084793

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bretz, W. A., Corby, P. M. A., Hart, T. C., Costa, S., Coelho, M. Q., Weyant, R. J., Robinson, M., & Schork, N. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (US)
  • Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (BR)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2005
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
168-172
ISSN
  • 0008-6568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-976X
OpenAlex
W2049621853
Cited by
82
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Caries Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE 014528, DE 15351, R01DE015351, K12DE014528)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
Keywords
dental caries, heritability, twins, genetic contribution, environmental factors, tongue biofilm, lactic acid, white spot lesions, zygosity, children
MeSH terms
Acids, Child, Child, Preschool, Dental Caries, Dental Caries Activity Tests, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Linear Models, Quantitative Trait, Heritable

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review