CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 102Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Asymmetrically Altered Integrity of Cingulum Bundle in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Kim, Seog Ju, Jeong, Do-Un, Sim, Minyoung E., Bae, Soojeong C., Chung, Ain, Kim, Minue J., Chang, Kee Hyun, Ryu, Jeong, Renshaw, Perry F., Lyoo, In Kyoon·2006·Neuropsychobiology
DOI 10.1159/000098262
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Previously, our group reported the altered white matter tract integrity of the left anterior cingulate in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in whole-brain exploration. Current study intended to explore whether the alteration was more prominent in any specific regions of the cingulum bundle. Diffusion tensor images of 21 PTSD subjects and 21 healthy comparison subjects were acquired. Eight isocubic regions of interest (ROIs), i.e. bilateral rostral, subgenual, dorsal, and upper cingulum bundle, were selected. Fractional anisotropy values in each ROI, which indicate the white matter tract integrity, were measured and compared between groups. Relative to comparison subjects, PTSD subjects had significantly smaller fractional anisotropy values in the left side of rostral, subgenual and dorsal cingulum bundle (26.7, 25.0, 22.2% decrease, respectively), but not in the right side ROIs. We report an asymmetrical alteration of the cingulum bundle in PTSD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000098262

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1097%2F00001756-200305230-00002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 102

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S. J., Jeong, D.-U., Sim, M. E., Bae, S. C., Chung, A., Kim, M. J., Chang, K. H., Ryu, J., Renshaw, P. F., & Lyoo, I. K.
Affiliations
  • Gachon University (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Harvard University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Neuropsychobiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2006
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
120-125
ISSN
  • 0302-282X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0224
DOI
10.1159/000098262
OpenAlex
W2080022759
Cited by
102
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Neuropsychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, cingulum, white matter integrity, fractional anisotropy, hemispheric lateralization, anterior cingulate cortex, diffusion tensor imaging
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Chi-Square Distribution, Case-Control Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review