Cited by 121Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disorders and Treatments

A Controlled Study of 2 Doses of Idebenone in the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease

Weyer, G., Babej-Dölle, R.M., Hadler, D., Hofmann, S., Herrmann, W.M.·2008·Neuropsychobiology

Abstract

Two doses of idebenone were studied in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study in patients suffering from dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) of mild to moderate degree. Diagnosis was based on DSM-III-R (primary degenerative dementia) and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (probable Alzheimer’s disease). A total of 300 patients were randomized to either placebo, idebenone 30 mg t.i.d. or 90 mg t.i.d. (n = 100, each) and treated for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the total score of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Total) at month 6. Secondary outcome measures were the ADAS cognitive (ADAS-Cog) and non-cognitive scores (ADAS-Noncog), the clinical global response (CGI-Improve-ment), the MMSE, the Digit Symbol Substitution test (DSS) and several scales for the assessment of daily activities (the self- and observer-rating scales NAA and NAB of the Nuremberg Age Inventory NAI and Greene’s Assessment). Safety parameters were adverse events, vital signs, ECG and clinical laboratory parameters. Clinical and psychometric evaluations were performed at baseline, and after 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment. After month 6 idebenone 90 mg t.i.d. showed statistically significant improvement in the primary efficacy variable ADAS-Total and in ADAS-Cog. An analysis of therapy responders performed for 3 outcome measures (CGI-global improvement, ADAS-Cog, ADAS-Noncog), selected to represent different domains of assessment, revealed significant superiority of idebenone 90 mg t.i.d. with respect to placebo in each of the 3 variables and in the concordance of responses across the 3 measures. Exploratory results for a subgroup of patients (ADAS-Total > 20) showed dose-related superiority of idebenone additionally on ADAS-Noncog and the CGI-Improvement scale. Safety results were inconspicuous for all assessments. The study results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of idebenone in the treatment of DAT patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000119366

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study of 300 patients with Alzheimer type dementia treated for 2 years with 30 or 90 mg/day idebenone or placebo, there was a statistically significant improvement in ADAS score after 6 months, in a dose dependent manner.

    “The outcome of study was a statistically significant improvement in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) score after 6 months, in a dose dependent manner.”

    From Mitochondrial Approaches for Neuroprotection (2008) · cites this paper as [167]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weyer, G., Babej-Dölle, R. M., Hadler, D., Hofmann, S., & Herrmann, W. M.
Affiliations
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Venue
Neuropsychobiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-02-26
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
73-82
ISSN
  • 0302-282X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0224
OpenAlex
W2077893977
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
idebenone, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, dose comparison, cognitive function, treatment efficacy, drug safety, ADAS-Cog
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ubiquinone, Benzoquinones, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review