Cited by 120Gut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and HealthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

The individual-specific and diverse nature of the preterm infant microbiota

Barrett, Eoin, Kerr, Colm, Murphy, Kiera, O'Sullivan, Orla, Ryan, C Anthony, Dempsey, Eugene M, Murphy, Brendan P, O'Toole, Paul W +4 more·2013·Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the composition of the evolving microbiota of preterm infants at weeks 2 and 4 of life. SETTINGS: The paediatric intensive care unit of the Cork University Maternity Hospital. METHODS: The microbial diversity of faecal samples from 10 preterm infants was determined using 16S rRNA amplicon pyrosequencing technology. RESULTS: In total, 452 863 sequences were obtained from 20 faecal samples collected from 10 preterm infants, allowing a level of analysis not previously reported. The preterm infant microbiota samples were dominated by Proteobacteria (46%), followed by Firmicutes (45%), while the phyla Actinobacteria (2%) and Bacteroidetes (7%) were detected at much lower levels at week 2 of life. This colonisation pattern was similar at week 4 of life. At the family level, Enterobacteriaceae were detected at 50% and 58% at weeks 2 and 4, respectively. The preterm infants were characterised by a lack of detectable Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus genera commonly associated with the infant gut. In addition to the dominance of the Proteobacteria, a high level of interindividual variation was observed, indeed the relative proportions of different phyla, families and genera in different infants ranged from <1% to >90%. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that in addition to an uncharacteristic microbiota relative to that reported for healthy term infants, there was a large interindividual variation in the faecal microbiota diversity of preterm infants suggesting that the preterm microbiota is individual-specific and does not display a uniformity among infants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303035

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several factors are known to influence microbial composition at different stages of life, including genetic factors, mode of delivery, gestational age, exercise, medication use, living environment, and diet.

    “Several factors are known to influence microbial composition at different stages of life, including genetic factors, mode of delivery [vaginal birth or Caesarean section (C-section)], gestational age, exercise, medication use, living environment, and diet (237-240).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett, E., Kerr, C., Murphy, K., O'Sullivan, O., Ryan, C. A., Dempsey, E. M., Murphy, B. P., O'Toole, P. W., Cotter, P. D., Fitzgerald, G. F., Ross, R. P., & Stanton, C.
Affiliations
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Food Biosciences Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
  • Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, Biosciences Institute, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland
  • National University of Ireland (IE)
Corresponding author
Stanton, Catherine
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-01-08
Volume
98
Issue
4
Pages
F334-F340
ISSN
  • 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2052
OpenAlex
W2079266218
Cited by
120
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Research Board
  • Teagasc
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
preterm infants, gut microbiota, fecal microbiota, microbial diversity, interindividual variability, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Enterobacteriaceae, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus
MeSH terms
Feces, Fungi, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Ireland, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metagenome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review