Cited by 212Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsGlaucoma and retinal disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemiology of Major Eye Diseases Leading to Blindness in Europe: A Literature Review

Open access
Prokofyeva, Elena, Zrenner, Eberhart·2012·Ophthalmic Research

Abstract

The objective of this work was to study the epidemiology of major eye diseases leading to blindness in Europe through a systematic literature review. The literature search was performed using the Medline database (PubMed), with MeSH and free text search terms. Inclusion criteria for the studies were: (a) performed on a healthy population of Caucasian origin aged between 50 and 75 years; (b) diagnosed by ophthalmological examination in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases 10; (c) contained a detailed description of the sampling and diagnostic procedures and data resources; (d) sample size >500, and (e) published between 1990 and 2008. The results of 57 studies on the prevalence and incidence of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma are reported, providing an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of these diseases in Europe from an epidemiological perspective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000329603

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 101 references

1 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2808%2961759-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007%2Fs00347-007-1522-0 · DOI
  3. 10.1001%2Farchopht.1994.01090160076025 · DOI
  4. 10.1136%2Fpgmj.74.869.129 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–212 of 212

Metadata

Authors
Prokofyeva, E., & Zrenner, E.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Venue
Ophthalmic Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2011-11-26
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
171-188
ISSN
  • 0030-3747 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0259
OpenAlex
W2085022206
Cited by
212
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ophthalmic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Tistou and Charlotte Kerstan Stiftung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
blindness, eye diseases, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, prevalence, incidence, older adults, Europe
MeSH terms
Blindness, Europe, Eye Diseases, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review