Cited by 98Infant Nutrition and HealthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsNeonatal and Maternal Infections

Case Series of Bifidobacterium longum Bacteremia in Three Preterm Infants on Probiotic Therapy

Open access
Zbinden, Andrea, Zbinden, Reinhard, Berger, Christoph, Arlettaz, Romaine·2015·Neonatology

Abstract

Background: The use of probiotics as prophylaxis for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants is being increasingly practised. Objective: We report, for the first time, a case series of 3 preterm, very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants who developed bacteremia with Bifidobacterium longum on probiotic therapy with Infloran® containing viable B. longum. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 3 infants (of gestational age <30 weeks and birth weight <1,230 g). They were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Clinical data were retrieved from their medical records. Results: In infants 1 and 2, B. longum was isolated from the blood cultures when they were on probiotic therapy with Infloran or shortly after, respectively, and was interpreted as transient bacteremia. The clinical presentation of these infants did not require antibiotic treatment after the isolation of B. longum. Infant 3 developed an NEC despite probiotic therapy with Infloran and the blood cultures showed B. longum growth. This infant required explorative laparotomy and antibiotic treatment. The clinical isolates of B. longum and the strain of the Infloran capsule showed an identical profile on biochemical, mass-spectrometric and molecular analyses, suggesting a direct correlation between the administration of probiotics and bacteremia with B. longum in all 3 infants. Conclusions: The occurrence of bacteremia with bifidobacteria after its prophylactic administration in VLBW infants and its possible clinical consequences are a matter of concern. In the interests of safety, the use of probiotics in such a population should be indicated with caution and requires further investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000367985

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adverse events from probiotic strains in vulnerable populations include life-threatening pneumonia, endocarditis, and sepsis.

    “AEs include life-threatening pneumonia,106 endocarditis,107–111 and sepsis.112–115”

    From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [115]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jenke A, Ruf EM, Hoppe T, Heldmann M, Wirth S: Bifidobacterium septicaemia in an extremely low-birthweight infant under pro- biotic therapy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97:F217-F218.
  2. Walsh MC, Kliegman RM: Necrotizing en- terocolitis: treatment based on staging crite- ria. Pediatr Clin North Am 1986; 33: 179-201.
  3. Land MH, Rouster-Stevens K, Woods CR, Cannon ML, Cnota J, Shetty AK: Lactobacil- lus sepsis associated with probiotic therapy. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 178-181.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zbinden, A., Zbinden, R., Berger, C., & Arlettaz, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
Venue
Neonatology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2014-11-07
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
56-59
ISSN
  • 1661-7800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1661-7819
OpenAlex
W2048184458
Cited by
98
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neonatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Keywords
Bifidobacterium longum, bacteremia, probiotics, preterm infants, very low birth weight infants, necrotizing enterocolitis, probiotic safety, neonatal intensive care, blood culture contamination
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Bacteremia, Treatment Outcome, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, Bifidobacteriales Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review