Cited by 104Gender Roles and Identity StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessGender and Feminist Studies

Men's views on depression: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative research

Krumm, Silvia, Checchia, Carmen, Koesters, Markus, Kilian, Reinhold, Becker, Thomas·2017·Psychopathology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to the concept of "male depression," depression among men might be underdiagnosed and undertreated because of gender differences in symptoms and coping. There is evidence that men experience atypical depressive symptoms including irritability, aggression, substance abuse, and increased risk behavior. To date, a substantial number of qualitative studies on men's views on depression has been conducted in the last few decades. METHODS: Based on a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies on men's subjective perspectives on depression, we aim at a comprehensive understanding of men's subjective views on depression with a specific focus on masculinity constructions. RESULTS: Based on 34 studies assessed as appropriate for the study, 2 overarching subthemes could be identified: normative expectations regarding masculinity ideals and men's subjective perspectives of depression as "weakness." Men's strategies include denial of "weakness" and "closing up." Further themes include suicide, masculinity ideals as a healthy resource, and alternative masculinities. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Traditional masculinity values might serve as barriers but also as facilitators to adaptive coping strategies in depressed men. More research is needed to study the dimensions and role of alternative masculinities in the context of depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000455256

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Men do not necessarily subscribe to traditional ideals but demonstrate alternative forms of masculinity.

    “Furthermore, there is some evidence that men do not necessarily subscribe to traditional ideals but demonstrate alternative forms of masculinity (4).”
  • Norms concerning masculine roles impact men's attitudes toward depression and help-seeking.

    “Results of a systematic review of qualitative studies on men's views of depression confirmed the impact of norms concerning masculine roles on men's attitudes toward depression and help-seeking (4).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krumm, S., Checchia, C., Koesters, M., Kilian, R., & Becker, T.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Psychopathology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2017
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
107-124
ISSN
  • 0254-4962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-033X
OpenAlex
W2592826866
Cited by
104
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
16.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
male depression, masculinity, atypical depressive symptoms, gender differences in depression, alternative masculinities, suicide, coping strategies, underdiagnosis of depression
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Sexual Partners, Qualitative Research, Men's Health, Masculinity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review