Cited by 629Mental Health Treatment and AccessGender Roles and Identity StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Gender differences in depression

Angst, J., Gamma, A., Gastpar, M., L�pine, J.-P., Mendlewicz, J., Tylee, A.·2002·European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Background While there is ample evidence that the prevalence rates for major depressive disorder (MDD) in the general population are higher in women than in men, there is little data on gender differences as regard to symptoms, causal attribution, help-seeking, coping, or the consequences of depression. Method The large DEPRES Study dataset covering representative population samples of six European countries (wave I: 38,434 men and 40,024 women; wave II: 563 men and 1321 women treated for depression) was analyzed for gender differences. Results In wave I marked gender differences were found in the six-month prevalence rate for major depression but less so for minor depression; the gender differences for major depression persisted across all age groups. Even after stratification by clinically significant impairment and paid employment status, men reported fewer symptoms than women; as a consequence, men reached the diagnostic threshold less often. In wave II there were clear gender differences in causal attribution and in coping. Men coped by increasing their sports activity and consumption of alcohol and women through emotional release and religion. Women felt the effects of depression in their quality of sleep and general health, whereas men felt it more in their ability to work. Limitations The second wave of the study comprises treated depressives only and may be less representative than the first wave.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00406-002-0381-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angst, J., Gamma, A., Gastpar, M., L�pine, J.-P., Mendlewicz, J., & Tylee, A.
Affiliations
Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich (CH)
Corresponding author
Angst, J.
Venue
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2002-10-01
Volume
252
Issue
5
Pages
201-209
ISSN
  • 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
  • 0940-1334
  • 1433-8491
OpenAlex
W2248379178
Cited by
629
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 26
FWCI
22.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
gender differences, major depressive disorder, minor depression, depression prevalence, causal attribution, coping, help-seeking, symptom severity, work impairment, sleep quality, alcohol consumption, religious coping
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, France, Germany, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Sick Role, Spain, Prevalence, Sex Distribution, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review