The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laboratory diagnostic outcome applying detection criteria recommended by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH on Lupus Anticoagulant
Abstract
Summary: This study shows the diagnostic outcome of an APTT-based and two dRVVT-based commercial confirmatory integrated tests with the application of the recommendations by the Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) on Lupus anticoagulant (LA)/antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) issued in 2009 concerning the cut-off values for the screening, mixing and confirmatory tests for the detection of LA and the mandatory need to perform mixing tests of patient plasma with pooled normal plasma. The study population included 565 patients collected from a large central coagulation laboratory, for which the attending physicians requested LA detection. One-hundred-six healthy subjects (HS) and 131 selected patients on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) were included as negative controls. The results suggest that the performance of mixing tests is indicated for those methods with relatively poor specificity, but is less needed for those methods with high specificity. Furthermore, the SSC recommendation to use normal mid-value (i.e. the 50th percentile of distribution of results from healthy subjects) as the cut-off to interpret results of confirmatory tests, showed a modest increase in LA detection rate (sensitivity) but at the expense of specificity, particularly in methods with low specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although most of the commercial dRVVT reagents behave almost similar in LAC testing, it is important to note that differences have been observed (11, 12).”
From Mixing studies in lupus anticoagulant testing are required at least in some type of samples (2015) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection
PENGO, V., TRIPODI, A., REBER, G., RAND, J. H., ORTEL, T. L., GALLI, M., & DE GROOT, P. G. (2009) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03555.x · Cited by 1,197
Self-citationBrandt, J. T., Triplett, D. A., Alving, B., & Scharrer, I. (1995) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1649901 · Cited by 993
Laboratory investigation of lupus anticoagulants: mixing studies are sometimes required
FAVALORO, E. J., BONAR, R., ZEBELJAN, D., KERSHAW, G., & MARSDEN, K. (2010) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04090.x · Cited by 48
Moore, G. W., & Savidge, G. F. (2006) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2005.09.010 · Cited by 46
Normal plasma mixing studies in the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant
Thom, J., Ivey, L., & Eikelboom, J. (2003) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2003.0543h.x · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1006/jaut.2000.0409 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02454.x · DOI
- Rosner, 1987, Thromb Haemost, 57, 144, 10.1055/s-0038-1651083 · DOI · Paper page
- Devreese, 2010, J Thromb Haemost, 8, 1120, 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03807.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0049-3848(92)90266-D · DOI
- Tripodi, 2002, Thromb Haemost, 88, 583, 10.1055/s-0037-1613238 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1373/clinchem.2006.078683 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-0028-1085481 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04440.x · DOI
- 10.1055/s-0028-1085480 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.05.018 · DOI
- 10.1177/0961203312446389 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1055/s-0032-1304717 · DOI
- 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.153536 · DOI
Cited by
Recent Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Detection of Lupus Anticoagulants
Moore, G. (2014) · Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1364185 · Cited by 149
“63,68 Assays with higher speci fi city are less likely to require mixing tests to clearly demonstrate the presence of a LA.”
BackgroundAntiphospholipid antibody testing and standardization
Devreese, K. M. J. (2014) · International Journal of Laboratory Hematology · doi:10.1111/ijlh.12234 · Cited by 98
Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights and Hindrances
Vandevelde, A., & Devreese, K. M. J. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11082164 · Cited by 76
Mixing studies in lupus anticoagulant testing are required at least in some type of samples
Devreese, K. M. J., & de Laat, B. (2015) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.13020 · Cited by 63
Moore, G. W., Jones, P. O., Platton, S., Hussain, N., White, D., Thomas, W., Rigano, J., Pouplard, C., Gray, E., & Devreese, K. M. J. (2021) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.15438 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Biguzzi, E., Asti, D., Palmucci, C., Tripodi, A., & Chantarangkul, V.
- Venue
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 46-52
- ISSN
- 0340-6245
- 2567-689X
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory diagnostic outcome applying detection criteria recommended by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH on Lupus Anticoagulant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1160/th12-11-0850
- The paper
- Biguzzi, E., Asti, D., Palmucci, C., Tripodi, A., & Chantarangkul, V. (2013). Laboratory diagnostic outcome applying detection criteria recommended by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH on Lupus Anticoagulant. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1160/th12-11-0850
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.