Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laboratory diagnostic outcome applying detection criteria recommended by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH on Lupus Anticoagulant

Biguzzi, Eugenia, Asti, Daniela, Palmucci, Claudia, Tripodi, Armando, Chantarangkul, Veena·2013·Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

Summary: This study shows the diagnostic outcome of an APTT-based and two dRVVT-based commercial confirmatory integrated tests with the application of the recommendations by the Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) on Lupus anticoagulant (LA)/antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) issued in 2009 concerning the cut-off values for the screening, mixing and confirmatory tests for the detection of LA and the mandatory need to perform mixing tests of patient plasma with pooled normal plasma. The study population included 565 patients collected from a large central coagulation laboratory, for which the attending physicians requested LA detection. One-hundred-six healthy subjects (HS) and 131 selected patients on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) were included as negative controls. The results suggest that the performance of mixing tests is indicated for those methods with relatively poor specificity, but is less needed for those methods with high specificity. Furthermore, the SSC recommendation to use normal mid-value (i.e. the 50th percentile of distribution of results from healthy subjects) as the cut-off to interpret results of confirmatory tests, showed a modest increase in LA detection rate (sensitivity) but at the expense of specificity, particularly in methods with low specificity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1160/th12-11-0850

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1006/jaut.2000.0409 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02454.x · DOI
  3. Rosner, 1987, Thromb Haemost, 57, 144, 10.1055/s-0038-1651083 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Devreese, 2010, J Thromb Haemost, 8, 1120, 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03807.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/0049-3848(92)90266-D · DOI
  6. Tripodi, 2002, Thromb Haemost, 88, 583, 10.1055/s-0037-1613238 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1373/clinchem.2006.078683 · DOI
  9. 10.1055/s-0028-1085481 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04440.x · DOI
  11. 10.1055/s-0028-1085480 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.05.018 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0961203312446389 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1055/s-0032-1304717 · DOI
  15. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.153536 · DOI

Cited by

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Biguzzi, E., Asti, D., Palmucci, C., Tripodi, A., & Chantarangkul, V.
Venue
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Published
2013
Volume
110
Issue
07
Pages
46-52
ISSN
  • 0340-6245
  • 2567-689X
Cited by
19
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory diagnostic outcome applying detection criteria recommended by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH on Lupus Anticoagulant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1160/th12-11-0850
The paper
Biguzzi, E., Asti, D., Palmucci, C., Tripodi, A., & Chantarangkul, V. (2013). Laboratory diagnostic outcome applying detection criteria recommended by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH on Lupus Anticoagulant. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1160/th12-11-0850

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.