Cited by 161Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

How safe is the use of thiazolidinediones in clinical practice?

Rizos, CV, Elisaf, Moses, Mikhailidis, DP, Liberopoulos, EN·2009·Expert Opinion on Drug Safety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are widely used antidiabetic drugs with proven efficacy regarding mainly surrogate markers of diabetes management. However, efficacy on surrogate markers may not always translate into benefits in clinical outcomes. Thiazolidinediones are usually well tolerated; however, their use may be associated with several adverse effects. The first TZD, troglitazone, was withdrawn from the market owing to serious hepatotoxicity. However, this does not seem to be the case with newer TZDs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present review is to discuss the safety profile of this drug class. METHODS: We searched PubMed up to July 2008 using relevant keywords. CONCLUSIONS: Common side effects associated with TZDs include edema, weight gain, macular edema and heart failure. Moreover, they may cause hypoglycemia when combined with other antidiabetic drugs as well as decrease hematocrit and hemoglobin levels. Increased bone fracture risk is another TZD-related side effect. Thiazolidinediones tend to increase serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, with rosiglitazone having a more pronounced effect compared with pioglitazone. Moreover, rosiglitazone increases low density lipoprotein particle concentration in contrast to pioglitazone where a decrease is observed. Rosiglitazone has been associated with an increase in myocardial infarction incidence. On the other hand, pioglitazone may reduce cardiovascular events. Overall, TZDs are valuable drugs for diabetes management but physicians should keep in mind that they are associated with several adverse events, the most prominent of which is heart failure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14740330802597821

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizos, C., Elisaf, M., Mikhailidis, D., & Liberopoulos, E.
Affiliations
University of Ioannina (GR)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
Published
2008-11-25
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
15-32
ISSN
  • 1474-0338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-764X
OpenAlex
W1997490166
Cited by
161
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
thiazolidinediones, drug safety, adverse drug reactions, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, troglitazone, heart failure, hypoglycemia, bone fracture risk, LDL cholesterol, myocardial infarction, macular edema, edema, diabetes management
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Interactions, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Macular Edema, Weight Gain, Thiazolidinediones, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review