Cited by 541Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Cigarette Smoking, Cardiovascular Disease, and Stroke: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association

Open access
Ockene, Ira S., Miller, Nancy Houston·1997·Circulation

Abstract

Las enfermedades cardiovasculares son un amplio conjunto de patologías, que se posicionan como la principal causa de muerte en todo el mundo. Para determinar la probabilidad de desarrollar este tipo de patologías, se han propuesto múltiples modelos de predicción del riesgo, sin embargo, la falta de validación externa, así como sus características propias, imposibilitan la elección objetiva de un modelo predictivo. Con base en esta premisa, se buscó comparar los diferentes modelos de estimación del riesgo, aplicados a la población de la Unidad Vascular, Cardiológica y Neurológica, ubicada en la ciudad de Cartago, Valle del Cauca, a través de métodos de análisis de concordancia, identificando un bajo acuerdo entre los diferentes modelos comparados, reconociendo las diferencias en la elección uno u otro modelo y sus implicaciones en la distribución de los pacientes en los niveles de riesgo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.96.9.3243

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overwhelming evidence shows adverse effects of tobacco products and secondhand smoke on cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other serious illness.

    “On the basis of the overwhelming evidence for the adverse effects of tobacco products and secondary exposure to tobacco smoke on CVD, as well as cancer and other serious illness, the AHA strongly and unequivocally endorses efforts to eliminate the use of tobacco products and minimize exposure to second-hand smoke.26 -28”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ockene, I. S., & Miller, N. H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1997-11-04
Volume
96
Issue
9
Pages
3243-3247
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2121900171
Cited by
541
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 30
FWCI
12.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository Technological University of Pereira (Technological University of Pereira) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
cigarette smoking, cardiovascular disease, stroke, cardiovascular risk prediction models, risk stratification, external validation, risk prediction model comparison
MeSH terms
Cerebrovascular Disorders, Coronary Disease, Humans, Physician's Role, Smoking, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review