Cited by 1,279Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionRenal and Vascular PathologiesBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Relationship Between Aortic Stiffening and Microvascular Disease in Brain and Kidney: Cause and Logic of Therapy

O’Rourke, Michael F., Safar, Michel E.·2005·Hypertension

Abstract

A close relationship has been established between microvascular damage in brain and kidney and indices of age and hypertension (pulse pressure, aortic pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index). The mechanism of such association has not been established, nor has rationale for prevention and treatment of microvascular damage. A logical pathophysiological explanation can be offered on the basis of differential input impedance in the brain and kidney compared with other systemic vascular beds. Torrential flow and low resistance to flow in these organs exposes small arterial vessels to the high-pressure fluctuations that exist in the carotid, vertebral, and renal arteries. Such fluctuations, measurable as central pulse pressure, increase 3- to 4-fold with age. Exposure of small vessels to highly pulsatile pressure and flow explains microvascular damage and resulting renal insufficiency and intellectual deterioration, according to the mechanism established by Byrom >50 years ago. The logical approach to prevention and treatment requires reduction of central pulse pressure. Because the aorta and large arteries are not directly affected by drugs, this entails reduction of wave reflection by dilation of conduit arteries elsewhere in the body. This can be accomplished by regular exercise and by drugs such as nitrates, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers. The explanation given here accounts for greater and earlier vascular damage in diabetes mellitus (relative microvascular fragility) and is similar to that given for vascular changes of pulmonary hypertension caused by ventricular septal defects and other congenital vascular shunts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.0000168052.00426.65

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several pathways may connect aortic stiffness to microvascular brain damage, including endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress, mutually reinforcing remodeling of large and small arteries, and exposure of small vessels to high-pressure fluctuations in the cerebral circulation.

    “Several pathways may link aortic stiffness to microvascular brain damage. They include endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress,209 a mutually reinforcing remodeling of large and small vessels (ie, large-/small-artery cross talk),210 and exposure of small vessels to the high-pressure fluctuations of the cerebral circulation,211”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihyper- tensive drug therapy in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA. 1991;365:3255-3264.
  2. Hirata K, Vlachopoulos C, Adji A, O'Rourke MF. Benefit "beyond blood pressure lowering": beyond blood pressure or beyond the brachial artery (erratum J Hypertens. 2005;23:905-906). J Hypertens. 2005;23:551-556.
  3. Franklin SS, Gustin W, Wong ND, Larson MG, Weber MA, Kannel WB, Levy D. Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. Circulation. 1997;96:308 -315.
  4. Edwards JE. Functional pathology of the pulmonary vascular tree in congenital cardiac disease. Circulation. 1957;15:164 -196.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Rourke, M. F., & Safar, M. E.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2005-07
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
200-204
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2103868761
Cited by
1,279
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 63
FWCI
19.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
aortic stiffness, microangiopathy, central pulse pressure, aortic pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, input impedance, wave reflection, aging, renal failure, cognitive decline, diabetes mellitus, vascular fragility, nitrate, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, physical activity
MeSH terms
Aorta, Brain, Compliance, Humans, Kidney, Microcirculation, Vascular Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review