Cited by 43Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Magnetic measurement of S-T and T-Q segment shifts in humans. Part I: early repolarization and left bundle branch block

Open access
Savard, P, Cohen, D, Lepeschkin, E, Cuffin, B N, Madias, J E·1983·Circulation Research

Abstract

The direct-current magnetocardiogram not only shows the features usually seen on the electrocardiogram, but also shows the T-Q (baseline) shift due to cardiac injury current. The first direct-current magnetocardiogram measurements of the human heart are presented here. The hypothesis tested is that there is no injury current associated with the S-T shift seen in two electrocardiogram abnormalities: early repolarization, and left bundle branch block. The data from three typical early repolarization subjects and one typical left bundle branch block patient are presented. It is found, in each case, that although there is appreciable S-T shift, there is essentially no baseline shift on the direct-current magnetocardiogram. The absence of baseline shift proves that the S-T shifts in these cases are not "apparent" shifts, caused by a dc injury current which is interrupted during the S-T interval; instead, these are "true" S-T shifts caused by a current flowing only during systole, presumably due to an altered repolarization of the ventricles. It is also found that the direct-current magnetocardiogram does not have routine clinical application because of a practical problem. This is the presence of false baseline shifts due to noncardiac currents, mostly in the gastrointestinal tract, which could be suppressed in only about one-third of the subjects. However, the direct-current magnetocardiogram may be useful as a research tool, for clarifying the cause of the S-T shift in selected subjects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.res.53.2.264

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DC-MCG is clinically feasible, although requiring EMS.

    “Unfortunately, although requiring EMS, DC-MCG is also clinically feasible (107)”

    From Clinical magnetocardiography: the unshielded bet—past, present, and future (2023) · cites this paper as [107]

    The Discussion explicitly says the dcMCG “cannot at this time be used as a clinical diagnostic tool” because false T-Q shifts could not be reliably suppressed in most subjects. The Magnetic Measurements section describes use of a magnetically shielded room, but that does not support the claim that dcMCG was clinically feasible. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MCG can provide additional diagnostic information not achievable with electrocardiography alone.

    “although theory and experimental research suggest and confirm that it can provide additional diagnostic information not achievable with electrocardiography alone (1, 2, 4–6, 9, 16, 107).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Laham ] (1954) Etudes ElectrocardiogTaphiques. Paris, Librairie Maloine S.A. Lamb LE (1965) Electrocardiography and VectocardiogTaphy. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Linkens DA (1979) Modelling of gastro-intestinal electrical rhythms. In Biological Systems, Modelling and Control, edited by DA Linkens. New York, Peregrinius
  2. Savard P, Cohen D (1979) Magnetic measurements of the dc of the human heart: Coping with extraneous fields from other organs. Digest of 12th International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering 0erusalem), Beilinson Medical Cen- ter, Petah Tikva, Israel, p 36.5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savard, P., Cohen, D., Lepeschkin, E., Cuffin, B. N., & Madias, J. E.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
1983-08
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
264-273
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2137833623
Cited by
43
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
early repolarization, left bundle branch block, ventricular repolarization, electrocardiographic abnormalities
MeSH terms
Electrocardiography, Heart, Heart Diseases, Heart Function Tests, Humans, Magnetics, Myocardial Contraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review