Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 614

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ACCF/AHA 2011 Expert Consensus Document on Hypertension in the Elderly: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents

Open access
Aronow, Wilbert S., Fleg, Jerome L., Pepine, Carl J., Artinian, Nancy T., Bakris, George, Brown, Alan S., Ferdinand, Keith C., Forciea, Mary Ann, Frishman, William H., Jaigobin, Cheryl, Kostis, John B., Mancia, Giuseppi, Oparil, Suzanne, Ortiz, Eduardo, Reisin, Efrain, Rich, Michael W., Schocken, Douglas D., Weber, Michael A., Wesley, Deborah J.·2011·Circulation

Abstract

Prevention of Hypertension and Its ConsequencesResearch should include both fundamental and clinical investigation defining pathogenesis of increased vascular and LV stiffness; RCTs to define appropriate treatment thresholds and goals; comparative effectiveness trials testing various treatment strategies (ie, different regimens and different intensities of lifestyle modification); and assessing the relative safety and efficacy of these approaches in the prevention of mortality and morbidity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/cir.0b013e31821daaf6

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Aronow, W. S., Fleg, J. L., Pepine, C. J., Artinian, N. T., Bakris, G., Brown, A. S., Ferdinand, K. C., Forciea, M. A., Frishman, W. H., Jaigobin, C., Kostis, J. B., Mancia, G., Oparil, S., Ortiz, E., Reisin, E., Rich, M. W., Schocken, D. D., Weber, M. A., & Wesley, D. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2011-05-31
Volume
123
Issue
21
Pages
2434-2506
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2196328866
Cited by
614
References
78
FWCI
58.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.