Cited by 261Alcohol Consumption and Health EffectsCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsNutritional Studies and Diet

Drinking Frequency, Mediating Biomarkers, and Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Women and Men

Mukamal, Kenneth J., Jensen, Majken K., Grønbæk, Morten, Stampfer, Meir J., Manson, JoAnn E., Pischon, Tobias, Rimm, Eric B.·2005·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The associations of drinking frequency and quantity with risk of myocardial infarction have not been studied among women, and the degree to which specific risk factors mediate the inverse association of drinking frequency with risk of myocardial infarction is uncertain. Methods and Results— We conducted nested case-control studies of 32 826 women enrolled in the Nurses Health Study followed up from 1990 to 1998 and 18 225 men enrolled in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study followed up from 1994 to 2000. A total of 249 women and 266 men with incident myocardial infarction were matched on age, smoking, and date of entry to 498 female and 532 male control participants. We determined the risk of myocardial infarction related to frequency and quantity of alcohol intake and the change in risk before and after adjustment for putative cardiovascular risk factors. Among both women and men, drinking frequency tended to be associated with lower risk of myocardial infarction, with the lowest risks among those who drank 3 to 7 days per week. Further adjustment for levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin A 1c , and fibrinogen attenuated 75% of the association of frequent drinking with risk among women and fully attenuated the association among men. Conclusions— Alcohol intake at least 3 to 4 days per week is associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction among women and men, an association apparently attributable to the relationship of alcohol with HDL cholesterol, fibrinogen, and hemoglobin A 1c . Because the effects of alcohol on HDL cholesterol, fibrinogen, and insulin sensitivity have been confirmed in randomized trials, our findings support the hypothesis that the inverse relation of alcohol use and myocardial infarction is causal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.105.537704

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pattern of drinking appears relevant, with lowest cardiovascular risk seen among individuals who drink moderately on several days of the week, rather than among irregular or binge drinkers.

    “The pattern of drinking appears quite relevant, with lowest cardiovascular risk seen among individuals who drink moderately on several days of the week, rather than among irregular or binge drinkers.107”

    From Components of a Cardioprotective Diet: New Insights (2011) · cites this paper as [107]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mukamal, K. J., Jensen, M. K., Grønbæk, M., Stampfer, M. J., Manson, J. E., Pischon, T., & Rimm, E. B.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2005-09-06
Volume
112
Issue
10
Pages
1406-1413
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2067676761
Cited by
261
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA55075)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA-11181, R01AA011181)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL035464, HL35464)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-55075)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
alcohol consumption, drinking frequency, myocardial infarction, HDL cholesterol, fibrinogen, HbA1c, insulin sensitivity, cardiovascular risk factors, mediation, sex differences, Nurses' Health Study, Health Professionals Follow-up Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Female, Fibrinogen, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review