Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,153

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Assessment of Endothelial Function: From Research Into Clinical Practice

Open access
Flammer, Andreas J., Anderson, Todd, Celermajer, David S., Creager, Mark A., Deanfield, John, Ganz, Peter, Hamburg, Naomi M., Lüscher, Thomas F., Shechter, Michael, Taddei, Stefano, Vita, Joseph A., Lerman, Amir·2012·Circulation

Abstract

The discovery of the endothelium as a crucial organ for the regulation of the vasculature to physiological needs and the recognition of endothelial dysfunction as a key pathological condition - which is associated with most if not all cardiovascular risk factors - led to a tremendous boost of endothelial research in the past 3 decades. Despite the possibility to measure endothelial function in the individual and its widespread use in research, its use as a clinical tool in daily medicine is not established yet. We review the most common methods to assess vascular function in humans and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Furthermore we give an overview about clinical settings were endothelial function measurements may be valuable in individual patients. Specifically, we provide information why endothelial function is not only a risk marker for cardiovascular risk but may also provides prognostic information beyond commonly used risk scores in primary prevention, and in patients with already established coronary disease. We conclude, that non-invasive endothelial function measurements provide valuable additional information, however, to ascertain its use for daily clinical practice, future research should determine whether endothelial function can be used to guide treatment in the individual and if this translates into better outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.112.093245

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 1,153

Metadata

Authors
Flammer, A. J., Anderson, T., Celermajer, D. S., Creager, M. A., Deanfield, J., Ganz, P., Hamburg, N. M., Lüscher, T. F., Shechter, M., Taddei, S., Vita, J. A., & Lerman, A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2012-08-07
Volume
126
Issue
6
Pages
753-767
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2045096300
Cited by
1,153
References
10
FWCI
40.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Assessment of Endothelial Function: From Research Into Clinical Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.112.093245
The paper
Flammer, A. J., Anderson, T., Celermajer, D. S., Creager, M. A., Deanfield, J., Ganz, P., Hamburg, N. M., Lüscher, T. F., Shechter, M., Taddei, S., Vita, J. A., & Lerman, A. (2012). The Assessment of Endothelial Function: From Research Into Clinical Practice. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.112.093245

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.