Cited by 255Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Discordance of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol with alternative LDL-related measures and future coronary events

Open access
Mora, Samia, Buring, Julie E., Ridker, Paul M·2014·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the traditional measure of risk attributable to LDL. Non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (NHDL-C), apolipoprotein B (apoB), and LDL particle number (LDL-P) are alternative measures of LDL-related risk. However, the clinical utility of these measures may only become apparent among individuals for whom levels are inconsistent (discordant) with LDL-C. Methods and Results—: LDL-C was measured directly, NHDL-C was calculated, apoB was measured with immunoassay, and LDL-P was measured with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy among 27 533 healthy women (median follow-up 17.2 years; 1070 incident coronary events). Participants were grouped by median LDL-C (121 mg/dL) and each of NHDL-C, apoB, and LDL-P. Discordance was defined as LDL-C greater than or equal to the median and the alternative measure less than the median, or vice versa. Despite high LDL-C correlations with NHDL-C, apoB, and LDL-P ( r =0.910, 0.785, and 0.692; all P <0.0001), prevalence of LDL-C discordance as defined by median cut points was 11.6%, 18.9%, and 24.3% for NHDL-C, apoB, and LDL-P, respectively. Among women with LDL-C less than the median, coronary risk was underestimated for women with discordant (greater than or equal to the median) NHDL-C (age-adjusted hazard ratio, 2.92; 95% confidence interval, 2.33–3.67), apoB (2.48, 2.01–3.07), or LDL-P (2.32, 1.88–2.85) compared with women with concordant levels. Conversely, among women with LDL-C greater than or equal to the median, risk was overestimated for women with discordant (less than the median) NHDL-C (0.40, 0.29–0.57), apoB (0.34, 0.26–0.46), or LDL-P (0.42, 0.33–0.53). After multivariable adjustment for potentially mediating factors, including HDL cholesterol and triglycerides, coronary risk remained underestimated or overestimated by ≈20% to 50% for women with discordant levels. Conclusions—: For women with discordant LDL-related measures, coronary risk may be underestimated or overestimated when LDL-C alone is used. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00000479.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.113.005873

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mora, S., Buring, J. E., & Ridker, P. M.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2014-02-04
Volume
129
Issue
5
Pages
553-561
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2123027967
Cited by
255
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 1
FWCI
18.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl043851-10, HL 43851)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL080467, R01‐HL043851, HL43851, K08HL094375, HL080467)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-47988, R01CA047988)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, LDL particle number, coronary heart disease risk, women, LDL particle size, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, risk prediction model
MeSH terms
Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lipoproteins, LDL, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review