Cited by 256Sodium Intake and HealthBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNutritional Studies and Diet

Lower Levels of Sodium Intake and Reduced Cardiovascular Risk

Open access
Cook, Nancy R., Appel, Lawrence J., Whelton, Paul K.·2014·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Recent studies have raised the possibility of adverse effects of low sodium, particularly <2300 mg/d, on cardiovascular disease; however, these paradoxical findings might have resulted from suboptimal measurement of sodium and potential biases related to indication or reverse causation. Methods and Results—: Phases 1 and 2 of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention (TOHP) collected multiple 24-hour urine specimens among prehypertensive individuals. During extended posttrial surveillance, 193 cardiovascular events or cardiovascular disease deaths occurred among 2275 participants not in a sodium reduction intervention with 10 (TOHP II) or 15 (TOHP I) years of posttrial follow-up. Median sodium excretion was 3630 mg/d, with 1.4% of the participants having intake <1500 mg/d and 10% <2300 mg/d, consistent with national levels. Compared with those with sodium excretion of 3600 to <4800 mg/d, risk for those with sodium <2300 mg/d was 32% lower after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.34–1.37; P for trend=0.13). There was a linear 17% increase in risk per 1000 mg/d increase in sodium ( P =0.05). Spline curves supported a linear association of sodium with cardiovascular events, which continued to decrease from 3600 to 2300 and 1500 mg/d, although the data were sparse at the lowest levels. Controlling for creatinine levels had little effect on these results. Conclusions—: Results from the TOHP studies, which overcome the major methodological challenges of prior studies, are consistent with overall health benefits of reducing sodium intake to the 1500 to 2300 mg/d range in the majority of the population, in agreement with current dietary guidelines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.113.006032

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a large sodium study which excluded sick individuals at baseline and collected multiple 24-hour urine per subject, participants with lowest intakes (<2300 mg/d) experienced 32% lower CVD risk than those consuming high intakes, with evidence for linearly decreasing risk.

    “In comparison, during extended surveillance in a large sodium study which excluded sick individuals at baseline and collected multiple 24-hour urine per subject, minimizing the potential influence of these biases, participants with lowest intakes (<2300 mg/d) experienced 32% lower CVD risk than those consuming high intakes, with evidence for linearly decreasing risk.317”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, N. R., Appel, L. J., & Whelton, P. K.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2014-03-04
Volume
129
Issue
9
Pages
981-989
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2070187546
Cited by
256
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25
FWCI
28.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2u01hl037884-05, 5u01hl037924-09, 2u01hl037904-05, 5u01hl037906-09, 5u01hl037849-07, 5u01hl037854-09, 5u01hl037852-11, 5u01hl037907-08, UL1TR001079, 1u01hl037872-01, 5u01hl037899-08, 5u01hl037853-09)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-37924, HL 37849, HL 37899, HL37852, HL 37904, HL-37854, HL-37872, HL37906, HL37853, HL 37884, R01HL057915, HL37915, HL-37907)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
sodium intake, sodium restriction, cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular events, sodium reduction, dietary guidelines, creatinine adjustment
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Creatinine, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sodium, Sodium, Dietary, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review