Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Determine Underlying Causes of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries in Women

Open access
Reynolds, Harmony R., Maehara, Akiko, Kwong, Raymond Y., Sedlak, Tara, Saw, Jacqueline, Smilowitz, Nathaniel R., Mahmud, Ehtisham, Wei, Janet, Marzo, Kevin, Matsumura, Mitsuaki, Seno, Ayako, Hausvater, Anais, Giesler, Caitlin, Jhalani, Nisha, Toma, Catalin, Har, Bryan, Thomas, Dwithiya, Mehta, Laxmi S., Trost, Jeffrey, Mehta, Puja K., Ahmed, Bina, Bainey, Kevin R., Xia, Yuhe, Shah, Binita, Attubato, Michael, Bangalore, Sripal, Razzouk, Louai, Ali, Ziad A., Merz, Noel Bairey, Park, Ki, Hada, Ellen, Zhong, Hua, Hochman, Judith S.·2021·Circulation

Abstract

Background: Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) occurs in 6% to 15% of myocardial infarctions (MIs) and disproportionately affects women. Scientific statements recommend multimodality imaging in MINOCA to define the underlying cause. We performed coronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging to assess mechanisms of MINOCA. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, international, observational study, we enrolled women with a clinical diagnosis of myocardial infarction. If invasive coronary angiography revealed <50% stenosis in all major arteries, multivessel OCT was performed, followed by CMR (cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and T2-weighted imaging and T1 mapping). Angiography, OCT, and CMR were evaluated at blinded, independent core laboratories. Culprit lesions identified by OCT were classified as definite or possible. The CMR core laboratory identified ischemia-related and nonischemic myocardial injury. Imaging results were combined to determine the mechanism of MINOCA, when possible. Results: Among 301 women enrolled at 16 sites, 170 were diagnosed with MINOCA, of whom 145 had adequate OCT image quality for analysis; 116 of these underwent CMR. A definite or possible culprit lesion was identified by OCT in 46.2% (67/145) of participants, most commonly plaque rupture, intraplaque cavity, or layered plaque. CMR was abnormal in 74.1% (86/116) of participants. An ischemic pattern of CMR abnormalities (infarction or myocardial edema in a coronary territory) was present in 53.4% (62/116) of participants undergoing CMR. A nonischemic pattern of CMR abnormalities (myocarditis, takotsubo syndrome, or nonischemic cardiomyopathy) was present in 20.7% (24/116). A cause of MINOCA was identified in 84.5% (98/116) of the women with multimodality imaging, higher than with OCT alone ( P <0.001) or CMR alone ( P =0.001). An ischemic cause was identified in 63.8% of women with MINOCA (74/116), a nonischemic cause was identified in 20.7% (24/116) of the women, and no mechanism was identified in 15.5% (18/116). Conclusions: Multimodality imaging with coronary OCT and CMR identified potential mechanisms in 84.5% of women with a diagnosis of MINOCA, 75.5% of which were ischemic and 24.5% of which were nonischemic, alternate diagnoses to myocardial infarction. Identification of the cause of MINOCA is feasible and has the potential to guide medical therapy for secondary prevention. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02905357.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.120.052008

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Reynolds, H. R., Maehara, A., Kwong, R. Y., Sedlak, T., Saw, J., Smilowitz, N. R., Mahmud, E., Wei, J., Marzo, K., Matsumura, M., Seno, A., Hausvater, A., Giesler, C., Jhalani, N., Toma, C., Har, B., Thomas, D., Mehta, L. S., Trost, J., Mehta, P. K., Ahmed, B., Bainey, K. R., Xia, Y., Shah, B., Attubato, M., Bangalore, S., Razzouk, L., Ali, Z. A., Merz, N. B., Park, K., Hada, E., Zhong, H., & Hochman, J. S.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2021-02-16
Volume
143
Issue
7
Pages
624-640
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W3102078311
Cited by
323
References
28
FWCI
21.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Determine Underlying Causes of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries in Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.120.052008
The paper
Reynolds, H. R., Maehara, A., Kwong, R. Y., Sedlak, T., Saw, J., Smilowitz, N. R., Mahmud, E., Wei, J., Marzo, K., Matsumura, M., Seno, A., Hausvater, A., Giesler, C., Jhalani, N., Toma, C., Har, B., Thomas, D., Mehta, L. S., Trost, J., . . . Hochman, J. S. (2021). Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Determine Underlying Causes of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries in Women. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.120.052008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.