Cited by 23ECG Monitoring and AnalysisMachine Learning in HealthcareCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Unlocking the diagnostic potential of electrocardiograms through information transfer from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Open access
Turgut, Özgün, Müller, Philip, Hager, Paul, Shit, Suprosanna, Starck, Sophie, Menten, Martin J., Martens, Eimo, Rueckert, Daniel·2025·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) can be diagnosed using various diagnostic modalities. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a cost-effective and widely available diagnostic aid that provides functional information of the heart. However, its ability to classify and spatially localise CVD is limited. In contrast, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides detailed structural information of the heart and thus enables evidence-based diagnosis of CVD, but long scan times and high costs limit its use in clinical routine. In this work, we present a deep learning strategy for cost-effective and comprehensive cardiac screening solely from ECG. Our approach combines multimodal contrastive learning with masked data modelling to transfer domain-specific information from CMR imaging to ECG representations. In extensive experiments using data from 40,044 UK Biobank subjects, we demonstrate the utility and generalisability of our method for subject-specific risk prediction of CVD and the prediction of cardiac phenotypes using only ECG data. Specifically, our novel multimodal pre-training paradigm improves performance by up to 12.19% for risk prediction and 27.59% for phenotype prediction. In a qualitative analysis, we demonstrate that our learned ECG representations incorporate information from CMR image regions of interest. Our entire pipeline is publicly available at https://github.com/oetu/MMCL-ECG-CMR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2024.103451

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Convincing prospective evidence that ECG-centred multimodal approaches can safely support gatekeeper-type decision making is still sparse.

    “At present, however, direct SHD-specific evidence for ECG-centred multimodal screening remains limited, and convincing prospective evidence that such approaches can safely support gatekeeper-type decision making is still sparse.69,70”

    From AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions (2026) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Dataset and pre-processing section (p. 5) describes a UK Biobank training and test dataset, while Prediction targets (p. 5) lists CAD, AF and diabetes rather than a direct SHD-specific screening evaluation. The limitations (p. 10) also note that the cohort was mainly healthy. This supports the narrower point that this study does not establish prospective gatekeeper safety, but the paper does not assess whether such evidence is sparse across the field. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Direct SHD-specific evidence for ECG-centred multimodal screening remains limited.

    “At present, however, direct SHD-specific evidence for ECG-centred multimodal screening remains limited, and convincing prospective evidence that such approaches can safely support gatekeeper-type decision making is still sparse.69,70”

    From AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions (2026) · cites this paper as [69]

    The limitations discussion (p. 10) says this study included mainly healthy subjects and calls for investigation with more balanced data. It does not assess whether SHD-specific evidence for ECG-centred multimodal screening is limited across the field, or whether prospective evidence supports safe gatekeeper decisions. Searches for SHD-specific screening, prospective validation, and gatekeeper decisions found no passage addressing those claims. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [37][37] P.-Y. Huang, H. Xu, J. Li, et al. , 'Masked autoencoders that listen,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2022. -
  2. [41][41] A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, et al. , 'An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,' International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021. -
  3. [42][42] H. Bao, L. Dong, S. Piao, et al. , 'Beit: BERT pre-training of image transformers,' in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turgut, Ö., Müller, P., Hager, P., Shit, S., Starck, S., Menten, M. J., Martens, E., & Rueckert, D.
Affiliations
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Munich Center for Machine Learning (DE)
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-04
Volume
101
Pages
103451
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406069341
Cited by
22
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
14.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
electrocardiogram, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cardiovascular risk prediction, multimodal contrastive learning, cardiac screening, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Cardiovascular Diseases, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review