Cited by 124Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Long-Term Weight Loss From Lifestyle Intervention Benefits Blood Pressure?: A Systematic Review

Aucott, Lorna, Rothnie, Helen, McIntyre, Linda, Thapa, Mohan, Waweru, Charles, Gray, Denise·2009·Hypertension

Abstract

Weight gain may increase blood pressure. Weight loss may reduce this. Reviews have considered the long-term effects of weight loss but are related mainly to more obese participants often on obesity medication and/or undergoing obesity surgery. This systematic review, based on lifestyle interventions for adults (18 to 65 years) with mean baseline BMI of <35 kg/m 2 , links weight change to blood pressure difference. A systematic review of studies reporting weight differences and blood pressure outcomes, published between 1990 and 2008 with follow-up of ≥2 years identified 8 clinical trials or controlled before and after studies (represented by 9 articles) and 8 cohort studies. Differences ranged from −11 to +4kg for weight, −7 to +2.2 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure and −13 to +6.1 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure. For this population group, no quantifiable relationship between weight and diastolic blood pressure difference was found, possibly because of small weight losses, differing weight status responses, or because pharmacologically controlled hypertension masked weight loss influences. Systolic differences were in line with previous reviews of 1 kg:1 mm Hg relationship, but only for follow-up periods of 2 to 3 years, possibly reflecting the fact that regardless of maintained weight loss, blood pressure often reverts back to higher levels. Lifestyle interventions for weight and blood pressure are limited in this target group, and there has been no exploration of successful intervention components. An individual patient data analysis may uncover baseline and medication effects, explore differences between weight groups, and may identify successful components. Such an analysis would enable effective development of preventative interventions for both hypertension and obesity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.135178

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aucott, L., Rothnie, H., McIntyre, L., Thapa, M., Waweru, C., & Gray, D.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2009-10
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
756-762
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2115856029
Cited by
124
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight loss, lifestyle intervention, blood pressure, obesity, long-term weight change, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, weight gain, hypertension prevention, obesity prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Humans, Hypertension, Life Style, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Time Factors, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review