The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of Blood Pressure in the Office: Recognizing the Problem and Proposing the Solution
Abstract
T he widely accepted cut-point for normal blood pressure (BP) in the office setting evolved over several decades, based on data derived from a variety of sources.The Actuarial Society of America was one of the first organizations to publish BP data on thousands of community residents, followed by other classic studies such as Framingham, Western Electric Company, Kaiser Permanente, and the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. 1,2In every instance, BP readings were based on measurements taken by specially trained health professionals following guidelines for proper BP measurement.As a result of these and other population studies examining the association between different BP levels and cardiovascular outcomes, the importance of systolic and diastolic hypertension was recognized and an office BP of 140/90 mm Hg became the universally established cut-point for separating normal BP from hypertension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“further measurement bias can be introduced to office BP if the person doing the measurement had poor adherence to measurement recommendations. 53”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Pickering, T. G., Hall, J. E., Appel, L. J., Falkner, B. E., Graves, J., Hill, M. N., Jones, D. W., Kurtz, T., Sheps, S. G., & Roccella, E. J. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000154900.76284.f6 · Cited by 3,985
Dahlöf, B., Sever, P. S., Poulter, N. R., Wedel, H., Beevers, D. G., Caulfield, M., Collins, R., Kjeldsen, S. E., Kristinsson, A., McInnes, G. T., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67185-1 · Cited by 2,909
Pickering, T. G., Hall, J. E., Appel, L. J., Falkner, B. E., Graves, J., Hill, M. N., Jones, D. W., Kurtz, T., Sheps, S. G., & Roccella, E. J. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000150859.47929.8e · Cited by 2,051
Fagard, R. H., Celis, H., Thijs, L., Staessen, J. A., Clement, D. L., De Buyzere, M. L., & De Bacquer, D. A. (2008) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.107.100727 · Cited by 742
Alerting reaction and rise in blood pressure during measurement by physician and nurse.
Mancia, G., Parati, G., Pomidossi, G. A., Grassi, G. M., Casadei, R., & Zanchetti, A. (1987) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.9.2.209 · Cited by 478
Poulter, N. R., Wedel, H., Dahlöf, B., Sever, P. S., Beevers, D. G., Caulfield, M., Kjeldsen, S. E., Kristinsson, A., McInnes, G. T., Mehlsen, J., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67186-3 · Cited by 319
Rutan, G. H., Kuller, L. H., Neaton, J. D., Wentworth, D. N., McDonald, R. H., & Smith, W. M. (1988) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.77.3.504 · Cited by 308
Results of the Ontario Survey on the Prevalence and Control of Hypertension
Leenen, F. H. H., Dumais, J., McInnis, N. H., Turton, P., Stratychuk, L., Németh, K., Lum-Kwong, M. M., & Fodor, G. J. (2008) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.071340 · Cited by 248
White, W. B., & Anwar, Y. A. (2001) · Blood Pressure Monitoring · doi:10.1097/00126097-200104000-00007 · Cited by 213
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Pickering G. High blood pressure. London: J&A Churchill Ltd; 1968: 229.
- 10.1161/circ.77.3.3277736 · DOI
- Ishikawa J. Nasothimiou E, Karpettas N, Feltheimer S, McDoniel S, Schwartz J Stergiou G, Pickering T. Automatic office blood pressure measurement without doctors or nurses present is more predictive of ambulatory blood pressure than is office blood pressure by mercury sphygmomanometer. J Hypertens. 2009; 27 (Suppl 4): S170.
- 10.1001/archinte.1993.00410240045005 · DOI
- Myers MG, Dawes M, Godwin M, Kaczorowski J, Kiss A, Tobe SW Minimum number of readings for automated office blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2009; 27 (Suppl 4): S197.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
Authors Task Force Members, Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redon, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cífková, R., Backer, G. D., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151 · Cited by 13,739
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
Williams, B., Mancia, G., Spiering, W., Agabiti Rosei, E., Azizi, M., Burnier, M., Clement, D. L., Coca, A., de Simone, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 · Cited by 10,286
European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012)
Authors/Task Force Members:, Perk, J., De Backer, G., Gohlke, H., Graham, I., Reiner, Ž., Verschuren, M., Albus, C., Benlian, P., Boysen, G., et al. (2012) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092 · Cited by 8,490
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Piepoli, M. F., Hoes, A. W., Agewall, S., Albus, C., Brotons, C., Catapano, A. L., Cooney, M.-T., Corrà, U., Cosyns, B., Deaton, C., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106 · Cited by 6,457
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Metadata
- Authors
- Myers, M. G., Godwin, M., Dawes, M., Kiss, A., Tobe, S. W., & Kaczorowski, J.
- Affiliations
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-200
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2171867406
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Keywords
- office blood pressure measurement, normotension, systolic hypertension, diastolic hypertension, cardiovascular outcomes, Framingham Heart Study, Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial
- MeSH terms
- Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Office Visits, Ontario, Reference Standards, Risk Factors, Self Care, Reproducibility of Results, Blood Pressure Monitors, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
