Cited by 172Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityRenal and Vascular Pathologies

Renal Sinus Fat and Poor Blood Pressure Control in Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals at Risk for Cardiovascular Events

Open access
Chughtai, Haroon L., Morgan, Timothy M., Rocco, Michael, Stacey, Brandon, Brinkley, Tina E., Ding, Jingzhong, Nicklas, Barbara, Hamilton, Craig +1 more·2010·Hypertension

Abstract

Fat in the renal sinus (RS), a region of the kidney in which low pressure venous and lymphatic vessels are present, may indirectly influence blood pressure. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between RS fat and control of blood pressure on receipt of antihypertensive medications. A total of 205 participants aged 55 to 85 years at risk for cardiovascular events underwent MRI assessments of abdominal and RS fat, measurement of blood pressure, and determination of the number of prescribed antihypertensive medications. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine associations among RS fat, blood pressure, and the number of prescribed antihypertensive medications. Abdominal fat averaged 416±160 cm 3 (median and interquartile range of 396 cm 3 and 308 to 518 cm 3 ); intraperitoneal fat averaged 141±73 cm 3 (median and interquartile range of 129 cm 3 and 86 to 194 cm 3 ); and RS fat averaged 4.6±3.2 cm 3 (median and interquartile range of 4.2 cm 3 and 2.2 to 6.6 cm 3 ). After accounting for age, sex, height, body mass index, and intraperitoneal fat, RS fat correlated with the number of prescribed antihypertensive medications ( P =0.010), stage II hypertension ( P =0.02), and renal size ( P ≤0.001). In conclusion, after accounting for other body fat depots and risk factors for hypertension, RS fat volume is associated with the number of prescribed antihypertensive medications and stage II hypertension. These results indicate that further studies are warranted to determine whether fat accumulation in the RS promotes hypertension.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.157370

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Excessive adipose deposition around the kidneys, such as renal sinus fat and perirenal fat, may be associated with hypertension even after adjustment for traditional risk factors, including overall adiposity and BMI.

    “Evidence suggests that excessive adipose deposition around the kidneys (for example, renal sinus fat (RSF) and perirenal fat (PRF)) may be associated with hypertension even after adjustment for traditional risk factors, including overall adiposity and BMI6,19–21.”
  • After accounting for other body fat depots and risk factors for hypertension, renal sinus fat volume was highly correlated with the number of blood pressure medications and with stage II hypertension.

    “After accounting for other body fat depots and risk factors for hypertension, RSF volume was highly correlated with the number of BP medications and with stage II hypertension19.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Dwyer TM Mizelle HL Cockrell K Buhner P Renal sinus lipomatosis and body composition in hypertensive, obese rabbits Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995 19 869 874 8963354

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chughtai, H. L., Morgan, T. M., Rocco, M., Stacey, B., Brinkley, T. E., Ding, J., Nicklas, B., Hamilton, C., & Hundley, W. G.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2010-11
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
901-906
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2112119265
Cited by
172
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG021332)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL076438)
  • National Cancer Institute (R33 CA1219601, R33CA121296)
  • National Center for Research Resources (MO1-RR07122, M01RR007122)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Keywords
renal sinus fat, blood pressure control, antihypertensive drugs, stage 2 hypertension, abdominal fat, intraperitoneal fat, kidney size, middle-aged and older adults, cardiovascular risk, kidney fat
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Antihypertensive Agents, Body Composition, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney, Risk Factors, Linear Models, Abdominal Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review