Cited by 39Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementHeart Failure Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiovascular Protection With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Milestone Achieved

Open access

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease are intimately linked. They share major risk factors, including age, hypertension, and diabetes, and common pathogenetic mechanisms. Furthermore, reduced renal function and kidney injury documented with albuminuria are independent risk factors for cardiovascular events and mortality. In major renal outcome trials and subsequent meta-analyses in patients with CKD, ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors and ARBs (angiotensin II receptor blockers) were shown to effectively retard CKD progression but not to significantly reduce cardiovascular events or mortality. Thus, a high residual risk for cardiovascular disease progression under standard-of-care treatment is still present for patients with CKD. In contrast to the above, several outcome trials with SGLT-2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors and MRAs (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) clearly suggest that these agents, apart from nephroprotection, offer important cardioprotection in this population. This article discusses existing evidence on the effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors and MRAs on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD that open new roads in cardiovascular protection of this heavily burdened population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.17005

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MRAs historically have not been well studied in people with diabetes and CKD because of the risk of hyperkalemia.

    “MRAs historically have not been well studied in people with diabetes and CKD because of the risk of hyperkalemia (122,123).”

    From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [123]

    The Cardiovascular Outcome Trials in Patients With HF section says earlier MRA findings provided no actual data for patients with properly defined CKD. The Old and Novel MRAs section discusses hyperkalemia with MRAs, but the paper does not say that hyperkalemia risk caused a historical lack of studies specifically in people with both diabetes and CKD. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MRAs historically have not been well studied in people with diabetes and CKD because of the risk of hyperkalemia.

    “A MRAs historically have not been well studied in people with diabetes and CKD because of the risk of hyperkalemia (140,141).”

    From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [141]

    The ‘Outcome Trials With Finerenone in Patients With Predialysis CKD’ section says that, until recently, no study had examined hard renal and cardiovascular outcomes with an MRA in predialysis CKD; it also reports hyperkalemia-related discontinuations in a trial involving people with type 2 diabetes and CKD. The paper does not say that hyperkalemia risk was the reason MRAs had historically been understudied in that population. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sarafidis, P., Papadopoulos, C. E., Kamperidis, V., Giannakoulas, G., & Doumas, M.
Affiliations
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Hippokration Hospital and First Department of Cardiology, AHEPA Hospital (V.K., G.G.), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2021-05
Volume
77
Issue
5
Pages
1442-1455
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W3147574539
Cited by
39
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
chronic kidney disease, cardioprotection, SGLT2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, cardiovascular outcomes, albuminuria, chronic kidney disease progression, renal protection, residual cardiovascular risk, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers
MeSH terms
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Cardiotonic Agents, Humans, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review