Cited by 3,111Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHormonal Regulation and HypertensionCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms

Open access
Zannad, Faiez, McMurray, John J.V., Krum, Henry, van Veldhuisen, Dirk J., Swedberg, Karl, Shi, Harry, Vincent, John, Pocock, Stuart J. +1 more·2011·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid antagonists improve survival among patients with chronic, severe systolic heart failure and heart failure after myocardial infarction. We evaluated the effects of eplerenone in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 2737 patients with New York Heart Association class II heart failure and an ejection fraction of no more than 35% to receive eplerenone (up to 50 mg daily) or placebo, in addition to recommended therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely, according to prespecified rules, after a median follow-up period of 21 months. The primary outcome occurred in 18.3% of patients in the eplerenone group as compared with 25.9% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.74; P<0.001). A total of 12.5% of patients receiving eplerenone and 15.5% of those receiving placebo died (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.93; P=0.008); 10.8% and 13.5%, respectively, died of cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.94; P=0.01). Hospitalizations for heart failure and for any cause were also reduced with eplerenone. A serum potassium level exceeding 5.5 mmol per liter occurred in 11.8% of patients in the eplerenone group and 7.2% of those in the placebo group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Eplerenone, as compared with placebo, reduced both the risk of death and the risk of hospitalization among patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00232180.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1009492

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]7. effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade and role in cardiac fibrosis. Circulation 1999;99:2694-701.
  2. [16]16. Evaluation Study (RALES). Circulation 2000;102:2700-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zannad, F., McMurray, J. J. V., Krum, H., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Swedberg, K., Shi, H., Vincent, J., Pocock, S. J., & Pitt, B.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2011-01-06
Volume
364
Issue
1
Pages
11-21
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2164705414
Cited by
3,111
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 184 · 2025: 168 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 177 · 2022: 228 · 2021: 197 · 2020: 190 · 2019: 181 · 2018: 178 · 2017: 177 · 2016: 187 · 2015: 227 · 2014: 209 · 2013: 239 · 2012: 216
FWCI
139.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
eplerenone, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, mild symptoms, heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, hyperkalemia, ejection fraction
MeSH terms
Eplerenone, Aged, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Cardiovascular Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Spironolactone, Proportional Hazards Models, Defibrillators, Implantable, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review