Cited by 90Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Development of a Smartphone‐Enabled Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Management Package to Facilitate Evidence‐Based Care Delivery in Primary Healthcare Facilities in India: The mPower Heart Project

Open access
Ajay, Vamadevan S., Jindal, Devraj, Roy, Ambuj, Venugopal, Vidya, Sharma, Rakshit, Pawar, Abha, Kinra, Sanjay, Tandon, Nikhil +1 more·2016·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background: The high burden of undetected and undertreated hypertension and diabetes mellitus is a major health challenge worldwide. The mP ower Heart Project aimed to develop and test a feasible and scalable intervention for hypertension and diabetes mellitus by task‐sharing with the use of a mobile phone–based clinical decision support system at Community Health Centers in Himachal Pradesh, India. Methods and Results: The development of the intervention and mobile phone–based clinical decision support system was carried out using mixed methods in five Community Health Centers. The intervention was subsequently evaluated using pre–post evaluation design. During intervention, a nurse care coordinator screened, examined, and entered patient parameters into mobile phone–based clinical decision support system to generate a prescription, which was vetted by a physician. The change in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose ( FPG ) over 18 months of intervention was quantified using generalized estimating equations models. During intervention, 6797 participants were enrolled. Six thousand sixteen participants had hypertension (mean systolic blood pressure: 146.1 mm Hg, 95% CI : 145.7, 146.5; diastolic blood pressure: 89.52 mm Hg, 95% CI : 89.33, 89.72), of which 3152 (52%) subjects were newly detected. Similarly, 1516 participants had diabetes mellitus (mean FPG : 177.9 mg/dL, 95% CI : 175.8, 180.0), of which 450 (30%) subjects were newly detected. The changes in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and FPG observed at 18 months of follow‐up were −14.6 mm Hg (95% CI : −15.3, −13.8), −7.6 mm Hg ( CI : −8.0, −7.2), and −50.0 mg/dL (95% CI : −54.6, −45.5), respectively, and were statistically significant even after adjusting for age, sex, and Community Health Center. Conclusions: A nurse‐facilitated, mobile phone–based clinical decision support system‐enabled intervention in primary care was associated with improvements in blood pressure and blood glucose control and has the potential to scale‐up in resource poor settings. Clinical Trial Registration: URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT 01794052. Clinical Trial Registry—India: CTRI /2013/02/003412.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.116.004343

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ajay, V. S., Jindal, D., Roy, A., Venugopal, V., Sharma, R., Pawar, A., Kinra, S., Tandon, N., & Prabhakaran, D.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Chronic Disease Control (IN)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Tandon, Nikhil
  • Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2016-12
Volume
5
Issue
12
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2562123090
Cited by
90
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5
FWCI
14.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Medtronic Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
hypertension, diabetes mellitus, task sharing, primary care, community health centers, blood pressure control, fasting blood glucose, newly diagnosed diabetes, Himachal Pradesh, resource-limited settings, scalable interventions, diabetes screening, blood glucose monitoring
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adult, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypertension, India, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Evidence-Based Medicine, Disease Management, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review