Cited by 5Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesDigital Mental Health Interventions

The digital prescription: a systematic review and meta-analysis of smartphone apps for blood pressure control

Open access
Motta-Yanac, Emily, Riley, Victoria, Ellis, Naomi J., Mankoo, Aman, Gidlow, Christopher J.·2025·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assess the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) in reducing blood pressure (BP) among individuals with high blood pressure and identify the impact of age, sex, and phone-based delivery methods on BP. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken according to the PRISMA and JBI. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), mixed methods, descriptive, and experimental studies enrolling adult patients (≥18 years) with high BP and containing DHIs with blood pressure management aspect were included. We used a random-effects meta-analysis weighted mean difference (MD) between the comparison groups to pool data from the included studies. The outcome included the pooled MD reflecting systolic (SBP) or diastolic (DBP) change from baseline to 6-month period. Risk of bias was assessed using standardised tools. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies with 33,826 participants were included in the systematic review. The pooled estimate (26 RCTs) showed a significant reduction in SBP (MD = -1.45 mmHg, 95 % CI: -2.18 to -0.71) but not in DBP (MD = -0.50 mmHg, 95 % CI: -1.03 to 0.03), with evidence of some heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis indicated that smartphone app interventions were more effective in lowering SBP than short message services (SMS) or mobile phone calls. Additionally, the interventions significantly reduced the SBP compared with the control, regardless of participant sex. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that DHIs, particularly smartphone apps, can lower SBP after 6 months in individuals with hypertension or high-risk factors, although changes might not be clinically significant. Further research is needed to understand the long-term impact and optimal implementation of DHIs for BP management across diverse populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105755

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There remains a critical knowledge gap regarding how technical modalities directly influence clinical workflow friction and human factor barriers at scale.

    “there remains a critical knowledge gap regarding how technical modalities directly influence clinical workflow friction and human factor barriers at scale [1,12].”

    From Clinical Efficacy and Patient Adherence Hurdles of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Frameworks in Managing Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Discussion (p. 7) calls for research on long-term effectiveness, diverse populations, and co-design to improve usability. It does not identify a knowledge gap about how technical modalities affect clinical workflow friction or human-factor barriers at scale; searches for workflow, implementation barriers, and human factors found no passage addressing that point. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [21][21] V. Boima, A. Doku, F. Agyekum, L.S. Tuglo, C. Agyemang, Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions on Blood Pressure Control, Lifestyle Behaviours and Adherence to Medication in Patients with Hypertension in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. eClinicalMedicine, 69 (2024) 102432, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.eclinm.2024.102432. -
  2. [46][46] Cochrane Collaboration. (2023). Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer software]. https://revman.cochrane.org/info. -
  3. [92][92] Siopis, G., Moschonis, G., Eweka, E., Jung, J., Kwasnicka, D., Asare, B. Y.-A., Kodithuwakku, V., Willems, R., Verhaeghe, N., Annemans, L., Vedanthan, R., Oldenburg, B., Manios, Y., & DigiCare4You Consortium. (2023). Effectiveness, reach, uptake, and feasibility of digital health interventions for adults with hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. The Lancet. Digital Health, 5(3), e144 -e159. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23) 00002-X. - · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motta-Yanac, E., Riley, V., Ellis, N. J., Mankoo, A., & Gidlow, C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Staffordshire (GB)
  • Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Motta-Yanac, Emily
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-03
Volume
195
Pages
105755
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405103231
Cited by
5
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Staffordshire Online Repository (Staffordshire University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Staffordshire University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mobile application, digital health interventions, blood pressure control, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, short message service, mobile phone calls, sex differences, age differences
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adult, Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review